Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21621 - 21630 of 29832 for des.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
). No. 2018AP887 6 de novo. Ott v. Peppertree Resort Villas, Inc., 2006 WI App 77, ¶11, 292 Wis. 2d 173
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248668 - 2019-10-16

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
hearing. ¶23 When a postconviction motion is denied without an evidentiary hearing, we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=701595 - 2023-09-12

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo. See Water Well Sols., 369 Wis. 2d 607, ¶12. We construe policy language from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240377 - 2019-05-07

[PDF] WI 42
of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96949 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Door County Department of Health & Family Services v. Scott S.
issues present questions of law that are reviewed de novo. See, e.g., State v. Migliorino, 150 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15269 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Nor-Lake, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co.
determines de novo. See Hull v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 222 Wis. 2d 627, 635-36, 586 N.W.2d 863
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15645 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Charles E. Keller v. Paul F. Sawyer
this court reviews de novo. Benjamin Plumbing, Inc. v. Barnes, 156 Wis. 2d 276, 279-80, 456 N.W.2d 628 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4276 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. Magett, 2014 WI 67, ¶29, 355 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242103 - 2019-06-13

[PDF] John C. Hagen v. City of Milwaukee Employee's Retirement System Annuity and Pension Board
5 ¶11 We review the circuit court's grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16571 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Steven C. Tietsworth v. Harley-Davidson, Inc.
for failure to state a claim is a question of law reviewed by this court de novo; this court “accepts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5169 - 2017-09-19