Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21621 - 21630 of 29712 for des.
Search results 21621 - 21630 of 29712 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
834. Then, we review the circuit court’s determination of the constitutional question de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239895 - 2019-04-30
834. Then, we review the circuit court’s determination of the constitutional question de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239895 - 2019-04-30
[PDF]
The Estate of Martha Burgess v. Carl Peterson
interpretation, which presents a question of law we review de novo. State v. Michels, 141 Wis.2d 81, 87
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10853 - 2017-09-20
interpretation, which presents a question of law we review de novo. State v. Michels, 141 Wis.2d 81, 87
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10853 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
violations in three steps, each of which presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102961 - 2017-09-21
violations in three steps, each of which presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102961 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
Bank, 224 Wis. 2d 288, 592 N.W.2d 5 (Ct. App. 1998). ¶8 We review a grant of summary judgment de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51983 - 2014-09-15
Bank, 224 Wis. 2d 288, 592 N.W.2d 5 (Ct. App. 1998). ¶8 We review a grant of summary judgment de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51983 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 39
(1987). Our review of the constitutionality of a statute is de novo. State v. Smith, 2010 WI 16, ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108953 - 2017-09-21
(1987). Our review of the constitutionality of a statute is de novo. State v. Smith, 2010 WI 16, ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108953 - 2017-09-21
2009 WI APP 96
, however, is a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Guzman, 166 Wis. 2d 577, 586, 480 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36685 - 2009-07-28
, however, is a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Guzman, 166 Wis. 2d 577, 586, 480 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36685 - 2009-07-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
there are no material facts in dispute. Id., ¶5. This court reviews a grant of summary judgment de novo. Fortier v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=981589 - 2025-07-10
there are no material facts in dispute. Id., ¶5. This court reviews a grant of summary judgment de novo. Fortier v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=981589 - 2025-07-10
2007 WI APP 121
is a question of law that the appellate court reviews de novo. American Family Mut. Ins. Co. v. American Girl
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28419 - 2007-04-26
is a question of law that the appellate court reviews de novo. American Family Mut. Ins. Co. v. American Girl
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28419 - 2007-04-26
Donald W. Vodak v. Martin Kinyon
misrepresentations. We review summary judgments de novo, employing the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11749 - 2005-03-31
misrepresentations. We review summary judgments de novo, employing the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11749 - 2005-03-31
Susan Ulrich v. Glenn Zemke
review de novo. Three & One Co. v. Geilfuss, 178 Wis. 2d 400, 410, 504 N.W.2d 393, 398 (Ct. App. 1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4306 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. Three & One Co. v. Geilfuss, 178 Wis. 2d 400, 410, 504 N.W.2d 393, 398 (Ct. App. 1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4306 - 2005-03-31