Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21621 - 21630 of 29832 for des.
Search results 21621 - 21630 of 29832 for des.
State v. Frederick F. Hafemann
of reasonableness is a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Whitrock, 161 Wis.2d 960, 973, 468 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8994 - 2005-03-31
of reasonableness is a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Whitrock, 161 Wis.2d 960, 973, 468 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8994 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
omitted). We review de novo whether the circuit court applied the correct legal standards. Id., ¶25. ¶32
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134506 - 2015-02-04
omitted). We review de novo whether the circuit court applied the correct legal standards. Id., ¶25. ¶32
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134506 - 2015-02-04
COURT OF APPEALS
and awarded her sole legal custody and primary physical placement of Y.S. Schworck filed a petition for a de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142942 - 2015-06-10
and awarded her sole legal custody and primary physical placement of Y.S. Schworck filed a petition for a de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142942 - 2015-06-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a prosecutor’s sentencing remarks breached the plea agreement is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=419814 - 2021-09-02
a prosecutor’s sentencing remarks breached the plea agreement is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=419814 - 2021-09-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was prejudiced are questions of law, which we review de novo. See id. ¶17 Courts may decide ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133694 - 2017-09-21
was prejudiced are questions of law, which we review de novo. See id. ¶17 Courts may decide ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133694 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Richard D. Herr v. State
the granting of a summary judgment motion de novo, applying the same methodology and standards as the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25346 - 2017-09-21
the granting of a summary judgment motion de novo, applying the same methodology and standards as the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25346 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Robert E. Ervin v. Great West Casualty Company
summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same standards employed by the circuit court. Smith v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13893 - 2014-09-15
summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same standards employed by the circuit court. Smith v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13893 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo. Id., ¶9. If, on the other hand, the defendant’s motion “does not raise facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=490464 - 2022-03-09
that we review de novo. Id., ¶9. If, on the other hand, the defendant’s motion “does not raise facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=490464 - 2022-03-09
[PDF]
State v. C&S Management, Inc.
these constitutional challenges de novo. Village of Oregon v. Waldofsky, 177 Wis.2d 412, 417, 501 N.W.2d 912, 913
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8332 - 2017-09-19
these constitutional challenges de novo. Village of Oregon v. Waldofsky, 177 Wis.2d 412, 417, 501 N.W.2d 912, 913
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8332 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Douglas A. Cavallari
a conspiracy under § 161.41(1x), STATS., is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11753 - 2017-09-20
a conspiracy under § 161.41(1x), STATS., is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11753 - 2017-09-20