Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21621 - 21630 of 58340 for speedy trial.
Search results 21621 - 21630 of 58340 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
NOTICE
: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion during the post-revocation proceeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31175 - 2014-09-15
: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion during the post-revocation proceeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31175 - 2014-09-15
State v. Joseph W. Marola
challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress certain items of physical evidence seized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13433 - 2005-03-31
challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress certain items of physical evidence seized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13433 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to the Gerberses, the testimony at trial established that excessive heat from an unknown source caused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93365 - 2013-02-25
to the Gerberses, the testimony at trial established that excessive heat from an unknown source caused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93365 - 2013-02-25
[PDF]
River Bank of De Soto v. Raymond Fisher
and expenses. The issue is whether, as the trial court concluded, the bank's conduct was unconscionable under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8520 - 2017-09-19
and expenses. The issue is whether, as the trial court concluded, the bank's conduct was unconscionable under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8520 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the first hearing on the termination of parental rights petition, (2) whether trial counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118154 - 2014-09-15
the first hearing on the termination of parental rights petition, (2) whether trial counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118154 - 2014-09-15
State v. Leonard J. LaRoche
to withdraw his pleas. LaRoche contends that the trial court erred in deciding that there was a sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12765 - 2005-03-31
to withdraw his pleas. LaRoche contends that the trial court erred in deciding that there was a sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12765 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that there is. ¶8 Summer’s sole argument on appeal is that the trial court relied on an erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42880 - 2009-11-03
that there is. ¶8 Summer’s sole argument on appeal is that the trial court relied on an erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42880 - 2009-11-03
Margaret Anderson v. David Anderson
husband, David Anderson.[1] Margaret contends that the trial court made inadequate factual findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16278 - 2005-03-31
husband, David Anderson.[1] Margaret contends that the trial court made inadequate factual findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16278 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael R. Caspersen
not relate to any evidence presented at his trial, and thus, we provide only a brief summary of the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4920 - 2005-03-31
not relate to any evidence presented at his trial, and thus, we provide only a brief summary of the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4920 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Derrick E. Hopkins
“effectively repealed” § 941.23. (Uppercasing omitted.) He also contends that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4502 - 2017-09-19
“effectively repealed” § 941.23. (Uppercasing omitted.) He also contends that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4502 - 2017-09-19