Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21621 - 21630 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Search results 21621 - 21630 of 58506 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the counterclaim. ¶5 At a court trial, Dobbs was represented by counsel and Trost appeared pro se. Trost
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144178 - 2017-09-21
the counterclaim. ¶5 At a court trial, Dobbs was represented by counsel and Trost appeared pro se. Trost
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144178 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
proceeded to a jury trial. Immediately prior to voir dire, however, defense counsel informed the court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=664980 - 2023-06-06
proceeded to a jury trial. Immediately prior to voir dire, however, defense counsel informed the court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=664980 - 2023-06-06
[PDF]
Marjorie J. Jones v. General Casualty Company of Wisconsin
. American Family sought indemnification from Westel for funds paid to Jones on its UIM policy. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13230 - 2017-09-21
. American Family sought indemnification from Westel for funds paid to Jones on its UIM policy. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13230 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 103
to dismiss, the trial court ruled that Honeck was immune from liability under WIS. STAT. § 893.80. Werner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36813 - 2014-09-15
to dismiss, the trial court ruled that Honeck was immune from liability under WIS. STAT. § 893.80. Werner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36813 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Ivan C. Mitchell
for postconviction relief. He argues that he was denied the effective assistance of trial counsel because counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21487 - 2017-09-21
for postconviction relief. He argues that he was denied the effective assistance of trial counsel because counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21487 - 2017-09-21
Gregory L. Schulz v. Time Insurance Company
CURIAM. Gregory L. Schulz appeals from the trial court's grant of summary judgment to Time Insurance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8148 - 2005-03-31
CURIAM. Gregory L. Schulz appeals from the trial court's grant of summary judgment to Time Insurance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8148 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
on the directed verdict. Because we conclude that the trial court should have given the breach-of-contract
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59543 - 2014-09-15
on the directed verdict. Because we conclude that the trial court should have given the breach-of-contract
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59543 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
An Information charged Diehl with perjury. The State alleged that during a trial that resulted in Diehl’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32080 - 2008-03-12
An Information charged Diehl with perjury. The State alleged that during a trial that resulted in Diehl’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32080 - 2008-03-12
State v. Stanley Soward
) (1999-2000).[1] Soward argues that the trial court erroneously denied his motion to suppress. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2834 - 2005-03-31
) (1999-2000).[1] Soward argues that the trial court erroneously denied his motion to suppress. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2834 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
after a jury trial. I affirm the judgment. 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42481 - 2014-09-15
after a jury trial. I affirm the judgment. 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42481 - 2014-09-15