Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21631 - 21640 of 64743 for b's.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was forty years, see WIS. STAT. §§ 940.09(1c)(b) and 939.50(3)(c), while the maximum possible sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137483 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Stacey C.
cause for this failure. See Carla B. v. Timothy N., 228 Wis. 2d 695, 706, 598 N.W.2d 924, 929 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5007 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
sobriety tests “[b]ecause [Stokes] was being argumentative and combative on scene,” and Officer Fuhrman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102984 - 2017-09-21

State v. Carol A. Davis
to deliver within 1000 feet of a school in violation of §§ 161.16(2)(b), 161.41(1m)(c)1, 161.49 and 939.05
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8279 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Joanne L. Stuckey v. David H. Stuckey
for contempt. Under WIS. STAT. § 785.04(1)(b), the court has authority to impose jail time as a remedial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16055 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Michael J. Arpke
)(a) and (b), and 885.235(1g)(cd). Under these statutes, if a person has two or more prior convictions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2868 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Patrice A. Prigge v. Dennis J. Prigge
, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Sheboygan County: JOHN B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14842 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
charged Howard with felon in possession of body armor, in violation of WIS. STAT. § 941.291(2)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30244 - 2014-09-15

State v. Jose S.
adoption after termination. (b) The age and health of the child, both at the time of the disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17899 - 2005-05-02

John A. Lashua v. Jodi L. Hansen-Lashua
placement under Wis. Stat. § 767.24(5)(b). That latter statute provides that the court shall consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17694 - 2005-04-13