Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21631 - 21640 of 64598 for b's.

COURT OF APPEALS
, or finding of not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect. (b) The evidence is in the actual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31934 - 2008-02-25

State v. Scott T. Grabowski
verdict. B. Restitution ¶8 Grabowski next contends that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6449 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
to a new trial with a twelve-person jury because he failed to raise the issue during his first trial. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15523 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
was ten minutes late for his curfew. The circuit court continued: [B]ut certainly the most serious part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55648 - 2010-10-18

COURT OF APPEALS
counsel was ineffective. B. Alleged reliance on inaccurate information. ¶11 Aranzamendi again
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57484 - 2010-12-06

COURT OF APPEALS
(1), 943.32(2), & 973.01(2)(b)3. A sentence is considered harsh or excessive “only where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34136 - 2008-09-29

State v. Booker T. Shipp
to make a more specific inquiry before excusing Groves cannot constitute ineffective assistance. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12868 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
is suitable for children.” Sec. 948.11(1)(b)1.-2. No. 2021AP711-CR 3 WISCONSIN STAT. § 948.11(2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=524367 - 2022-05-25

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the topics on which Dronso’s wife could testify to prevent prejudice. WISCONSIN STAT. § 905.05(3)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=909669 - 2025-02-05

State v. Eric Johnson
id. at 236-37, 548 N.W.2d at 76. B. Sequestration Motion. Johnson claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12223 - 2005-03-31