Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21631 - 21640 of 83957 for case number.
Search results 21631 - 21640 of 83957 for case number.
[PDF]
State v. John A. Clements
N.W.2d 17 (Ct. App. 1995). Thus, it appears that the trial judge in this case believed he had broad
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2734 - 2017-09-19
N.W.2d 17 (Ct. App. 1995). Thus, it appears that the trial judge in this case believed he had broad
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2734 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Melissa Newkirk v. Wisconsin Department of Transportation
with the requisite statutory requirements; (b) fosters judicial economy; (c) reduces the number of meritless cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14640 - 2017-09-21
with the requisite statutory requirements; (b) fosters judicial economy; (c) reduces the number of meritless cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14640 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Anthony A. Parker
2001 WI App 111 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 00
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2672 - 2017-09-19
2001 WI App 111 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 00
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2672 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 102.03(2)’s exclusivity provision. ¶9 The principal case Schmuck relies on is not on point
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70058 - 2014-09-15
. § 102.03(2)’s exclusivity provision. ¶9 The principal case Schmuck relies on is not on point
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70058 - 2014-09-15
Wisconsin Court System - Board of Bar Examiners members
justices Calendar Livestream courts Famous cases Visiting Court of Appeals Function Fees & filing Judges
/courts/offices/bbemembers.htm - 2026-01-12
justices Calendar Livestream courts Famous cases Visiting Court of Appeals Function Fees & filing Judges
/courts/offices/bbemembers.htm - 2026-01-12
COURT OF APPEALS
coverage based on Wis. Stat. § 102.03(2)’s exclusivity provision. ¶9 The principal case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70058 - 2011-08-22
coverage based on Wis. Stat. § 102.03(2)’s exclusivity provision. ¶9 The principal case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70058 - 2011-08-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case arose out of Butler’s communications by text message with 14-year-old Siara,1 which eventually
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=998870 - 2025-08-19
in this case arose out of Butler’s communications by text message with 14-year-old Siara,1 which eventually
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=998870 - 2025-08-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
arguments, and accordingly, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case arises out of the shooting death of R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=606370 - 2023-01-04
arguments, and accordingly, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case arises out of the shooting death of R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=606370 - 2023-01-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. 1 Because the principal players in this case share the last name Fanetti, we refer to them
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110527 - 2017-09-21
. 1 Because the principal players in this case share the last name Fanetti, we refer to them
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110527 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
not apply in this case because the circuit court adopted Marilyn’s proposed findings of fact verbatim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110527 - 2014-04-21
not apply in this case because the circuit court adopted Marilyn’s proposed findings of fact verbatim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110527 - 2014-04-21