Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21631 - 21640 of 64166 for records.
Search results 21631 - 21640 of 64166 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not to do so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247128 - 2019-09-25
not to do so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247128 - 2019-09-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
(1988). Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249880 - 2019-11-07
(1988). Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249880 - 2019-11-07
Jodine Y. Taylor v. Terry L. Taylor
a rational decision based on the application of the correct legal standards to the facts of record. Id. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6907 - 2005-03-31
a rational decision based on the application of the correct legal standards to the facts of record. Id. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6907 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joeval M. Jones
for a different lawyer. After discussing various portions of the record, the court denied the plea-withdrawal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21429 - 2006-02-15
for a different lawyer. After discussing various portions of the record, the court denied the plea-withdrawal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21429 - 2006-02-15
State v. Kurt W. Meyer
the facts of record under the proper legal standard and reasons its way to a rational conclusion. Burkes v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2967 - 2005-03-31
the facts of record under the proper legal standard and reasons its way to a rational conclusion. Burkes v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2967 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record, we reject the no-merit 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131951 - 2017-09-21
and an independent review of the record, we reject the no-merit 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131951 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. James E.J.
is to set forth on the record relevant facts and a statement of the reasons motivating waiver. See D.H. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12707 - 2017-09-21
is to set forth on the record relevant facts and a statement of the reasons motivating waiver. See D.H. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12707 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, the supplemental no-merit report, and Roberts’s responses, and following an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=507926 - 2022-04-13
, the supplemental no-merit report, and Roberts’s responses, and following an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=507926 - 2022-04-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
right to respond and has not responded. We independently review the record, as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231795 - 2019-01-08
right to respond and has not responded. We independently review the record, as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231795 - 2019-01-08
[PDF]
Thomas M. Holmgreen v. John A. Hulleman
that these documents are not a part of the record. The Holmgreens consequently move for fees and costs for what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25479 - 2017-09-21
that these documents are not a part of the record. The Holmgreens consequently move for fees and costs for what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25479 - 2017-09-21