Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21641 - 21650 of 83477 for civil case no. "90-77".
Search results 21641 - 21650 of 83477 for civil case no. "90-77".
Ronald W. Morters v. Aiken & Scoptur
2006 WI App 46 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2005AP703 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21327 - 2006-03-22
2006 WI App 46 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2005AP703 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21327 - 2006-03-22
COURT OF APPEALS
of termination of parental rights case, that there were issues of material fact remaining such that summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100241 - 2013-07-31
of termination of parental rights case, that there were issues of material fact remaining such that summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100241 - 2013-07-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).2 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072834 - 2026-02-03
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).2 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072834 - 2026-02-03
[PDF]
State v. Gerald D. Schrank
“only in exceptional cases.” State v. Cuyler, 110 Wis. 2d 133, 141, 327 N.W.2d 662 (1983). ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7001 - 2017-09-20
“only in exceptional cases.” State v. Cuyler, 110 Wis. 2d 133, 141, 327 N.W.2d 662 (1983). ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7001 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
This is a Fourth Amendment community caretaker case. Steven P. Palmer appeals from a circuit court judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33709 - 2014-09-15
This is a Fourth Amendment community caretaker case. Steven P. Palmer appeals from a circuit court judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33709 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
circumstances that would justify reopening the case. Accordingly, the court denied BV Nicolet and Belmonte’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82225 - 2012-05-07
circumstances that would justify reopening the case. Accordingly, the court denied BV Nicolet and Belmonte’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82225 - 2012-05-07
CA Blank Order
in each of three separate cases. Hane’s appellate counsel has filed no-merit reports pursuant to Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97142 - 2013-05-16
in each of three separate cases. Hane’s appellate counsel has filed no-merit reports pursuant to Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97142 - 2013-05-16
COURT OF APPEALS
could not order this sentence to run consecutively to the sentence in the 2003 case because he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49297 - 2010-04-26
could not order this sentence to run consecutively to the sentence in the 2003 case because he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49297 - 2010-04-26
[PDF]
Oral Argument Schedule - October 2022
are hereby notified that the following cases will be called for argument on the days stated. The calendar
/sc/orasch/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=552707 - 2022-09-27
are hereby notified that the following cases will be called for argument on the days stated. The calendar
/sc/orasch/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=552707 - 2022-09-27
[PDF]
2025AP000996 - 06-25-25 Order of J. Protasiewicz Denying Motion for Recusal
of contributions to my campaign. They also argue that I should decline to participate in this case
/supreme/docs/25ap996recusal.pdf - 2025-06-25
of contributions to my campaign. They also argue that I should decline to participate in this case
/supreme/docs/25ap996recusal.pdf - 2025-06-25