Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21641 - 21650 of 30242 for de.
Search results 21641 - 21650 of 30242 for de.
Frontsheet
Admission of Rusch, 171 Wis. 2d 523, 528-29, 492 N.W.2d 153 (1992). We review legal conclusions de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112193 - 2014-05-08
Admission of Rusch, 171 Wis. 2d 523, 528-29, 492 N.W.2d 153 (1992). We review legal conclusions de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112193 - 2014-05-08
Tee & Bee, Inc. v. City of West Allis
. The interpretation of a statute presents a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Kruzicki
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11161 - 2005-03-31
. The interpretation of a statute presents a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Kruzicki
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11161 - 2005-03-31
IBEW Local Union No. 2150 v. Rodney Stone
. Statutory interpretation and application also pose questions of law that we review de novo. Truttschel v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19958 - 2005-12-11
. Statutory interpretation and application also pose questions of law that we review de novo. Truttschel v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19958 - 2005-12-11
State v. Thomas F.
of Courtney E. to the facts of the case, raises issues of law which we review de novo.[4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8717 - 2005-03-31
of Courtney E. to the facts of the case, raises issues of law which we review de novo.[4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8717 - 2005-03-31
2007 WI APP 13
to an undisputed set of facts presents us with a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Rydeski, 214
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27329 - 2007-01-30
to an undisputed set of facts presents us with a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Rydeski, 214
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27329 - 2007-01-30
[PDF]
Donald W. Vodak v. Martin Kinyon
misrepresentations. We review summary judgments de novo, employing the same methodology as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11749 - 2017-09-20
misrepresentations. We review summary judgments de novo, employing the same methodology as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11749 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Raymond J. Topps v. County of Walworth
the interpretation of WIS. STAT. ยง 75.521. Interpretation of a statute is subject to de novo review. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5024 - 2017-09-19
the interpretation of WIS. STAT. ยง 75.521. Interpretation of a statute is subject to de novo review. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5024 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jonathan L. Franklin
of constitutional fact, which we review de novo. State v. Owen, 202 Wis.2d 620, 640, 551 N.W.2d 50, 59 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14414 - 2014-09-15
of constitutional fact, which we review de novo. State v. Owen, 202 Wis.2d 620, 640, 551 N.W.2d 50, 59 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14414 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256129 - 2020-03-10
of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256129 - 2020-03-10
[PDF]
NOTICE
sufficiency of the complaint and presents a question of law that we review de novo. Wausau Tile, Inc. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58508 - 2014-09-15
sufficiency of the complaint and presents a question of law that we review de novo. Wausau Tile, Inc. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58508 - 2014-09-15