Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21641 - 21650 of 63951 for records/1000.
Search results 21641 - 21650 of 63951 for records/1000.
State v. Edrick P. Robinson
in Texas. We conclude that the record is insufficient to make this determination, and we reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2827 - 2005-03-31
in Texas. We conclude that the record is insufficient to make this determination, and we reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2827 - 2005-03-31
Michael Schnake v. Circuit Court for Milwaukee County
as an officer. There is no evidence or offer of proof in the record that Karlovich had ever been disciplined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18177 - 2005-05-16
as an officer. There is no evidence or offer of proof in the record that Karlovich had ever been disciplined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18177 - 2005-05-16
[PDF]
Victoria Black v. Metro Title, Inc.
judgment record. The affidavit of Wanda Brooks, then the agent of Metro, averred that the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21394 - 2017-09-21
judgment record. The affidavit of Wanda Brooks, then the agent of Metro, averred that the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21394 - 2017-09-21
City of Whitewater v. Jeffrey L. Wyczawski
witness to answer improper hypothetical questions. We agree that there is no evidence in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3717 - 2005-03-31
witness to answer improper hypothetical questions. We agree that there is no evidence in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3717 - 2005-03-31
State v. Randy R. Cooke
held that the sentence was not unduly harsh because it was proportional to Cooke’s prior record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16205 - 2005-03-31
held that the sentence was not unduly harsh because it was proportional to Cooke’s prior record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16205 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
present. Id. at 697-98. The record is not clear when the probable cause determination was made. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103670 - 2017-09-21
present. Id. at 697-98. The record is not clear when the probable cause determination was made. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103670 - 2017-09-21
State v. Robert J. Jeske
rulings: A court exercises discretion when it considers the facts of record and reasons its way
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8622 - 2005-03-31
rulings: A court exercises discretion when it considers the facts of record and reasons its way
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8622 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and states the reason on the record.”). Thomas’s lawyer told the circuit court at the sentencing hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104165 - 2017-09-21
and states the reason on the record.”). Thomas’s lawyer told the circuit court at the sentencing hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104165 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit reports and responses, we agree with counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100221 - 2017-09-21
reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit reports and responses, we agree with counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100221 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
estate, unless the court finds substantial reason not to do so and states the reason on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104165 - 2013-11-12
estate, unless the court finds substantial reason not to do so and states the reason on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104165 - 2013-11-12