Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21651 - 21660 of 30242 for de.
Search results 21651 - 21660 of 30242 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
beyond a reasonable doubt is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Booker, 2006 WI 79
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=770086 - 2024-02-29
beyond a reasonable doubt is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Booker, 2006 WI 79
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=770086 - 2024-02-29
Discovery Technologies, Inc. v. Avidcare Corporation
court that anything Avitall or the corporation had was basically of de minimis value. There was nothing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7372 - 2005-03-31
court that anything Avitall or the corporation had was basically of de minimis value. There was nothing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7372 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Joseph R. Przybilla
constitutional questions de novo. State v. Woods, 117 Wis.2d 701, 715, 345 N.W.2d 457, 465 (1984). We have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9172 - 2017-09-19
constitutional questions de novo. State v. Woods, 117 Wis.2d 701, 715, 345 N.W.2d 457, 465 (1984). We have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9172 - 2017-09-19
State v. Norman O. Brown
to effective assistance of counsel is a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. at 634, 369
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12714 - 2005-03-31
to effective assistance of counsel is a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. at 634, 369
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12714 - 2005-03-31
W. George Bowring v. Wisconsin Division of Highways & Transportation
. This presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See Torke/Wirth/Pujara v. Lakeshore Towers, 192 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10308 - 2005-03-31
. This presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See Torke/Wirth/Pujara v. Lakeshore Towers, 192 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10308 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s colloquy is a question of law that we review de novo. See Therese S., 314 Wis. 2d 493, ¶7. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192711 - 2017-09-21
court’s colloquy is a question of law that we review de novo. See Therese S., 314 Wis. 2d 493, ¶7. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192711 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Bernard G. Tainter
354. We review constitutional and statutory interpretation questions de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4441 - 2017-09-19
354. We review constitutional and statutory interpretation questions de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4441 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
, which we review de novo. See State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91, ¶24, 342 Wis. 2d 710, 817 N.W.2d 410
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101362 - 2013-08-28
, which we review de novo. See State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91, ¶24, 342 Wis. 2d 710, 817 N.W.2d 410
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101362 - 2013-08-28
Arthur H. Hurckman v. Secura Insurance Company
the issues de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816, 820 (1987). Summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9898 - 2005-03-31
the issues de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816, 820 (1987). Summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9898 - 2005-03-31
David Miswald v. Waukesha County Board of Adjustment
statutory certiorari judicial review, our standard of review of the circuit court's ruling is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9203 - 2005-03-31
statutory certiorari judicial review, our standard of review of the circuit court's ruling is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9203 - 2005-03-31