Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21651 - 21660 of 29823 for des.
Search results 21651 - 21660 of 29823 for des.
Diane M. Wettstaedt v. Gary E. Wettstaedt
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3250 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3250 - 2005-03-31
J.G. Wentworth S.S.C. Limited Partnership v. Sean Edward Callahan
The interpretation of a contract presents a question of law, which is reviewed by this court de novo. See Northern
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4487 - 2005-03-31
The interpretation of a contract presents a question of law, which is reviewed by this court de novo. See Northern
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4487 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
will review de novo whether an investigatory stop was justified by reasonable suspicion. Id. ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68030 - 2011-07-19
will review de novo whether an investigatory stop was justified by reasonable suspicion. Id. ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68030 - 2011-07-19
Daniel J. R. LaCount v. Rosemary A. Salkowski
). The application of a statute to undisputed facts is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Wilke, 152
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5015 - 2005-03-31
). The application of a statute to undisputed facts is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Wilke, 152
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5015 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, which we review de novo. See State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91, ¶24, 342 Wis. 2d 710, 817 N.W.2d 410
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101362 - 2013-08-28
, which we review de novo. See State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91, ¶24, 342 Wis. 2d 710, 817 N.W.2d 410
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101362 - 2013-08-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo. See Therese S., 314 Wis. 2d 493, ¶7. In doing so, we look to the totality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184887 - 2017-09-21
that we review de novo. See Therese S., 314 Wis. 2d 493, ¶7. In doing so, we look to the totality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184887 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.2d 305. However, we review de novo whether counsel’s performance was deficient or prejudicial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176592 - 2017-09-21
.2d 305. However, we review de novo whether counsel’s performance was deficient or prejudicial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176592 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 128
and application of a statute to a set of facts is a question of law, which we review de novo. Bell v. Neugart
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87657 - 2014-09-15
and application of a statute to a set of facts is a question of law, which we review de novo. Bell v. Neugart
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87657 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Because this involves a question of statutory interpretation, we review Thornton’s challenge de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62727 - 2014-09-15
. Because this involves a question of statutory interpretation, we review Thornton’s challenge de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62727 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Frederick F. Hafemann
of reasonableness is a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Whitrock, 161 Wis.2d 960, 973, 468 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8994 - 2017-09-19
of reasonableness is a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Whitrock, 161 Wis.2d 960, 973, 468 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8994 - 2017-09-19