Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21661 - 21670 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Search results 21661 - 21670 of 58506 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and therefore not voluntary, and asserts that the trial court should have granted his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=485785 - 2022-02-22
and therefore not voluntary, and asserts that the trial court should have granted his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=485785 - 2022-02-22
[PDF]
State v. Jesse S.
guidance in meeting court-ordered conditions, and that the trial court erred by concluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12382 - 2017-09-21
guidance in meeting court-ordered conditions, and that the trial court erred by concluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12382 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Anthony Harris
), 161.01(14), STATS., and of carrying a concealed weapon, see § 941.23, STATS. He claims the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9176 - 2017-09-19
), 161.01(14), STATS., and of carrying a concealed weapon, see § 941.23, STATS. He claims the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9176 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jose G.
terminating his parental rights to Joe F. The dispositive issue in this case is whether the trial court had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10894 - 2017-09-20
terminating his parental rights to Joe F. The dispositive issue in this case is whether the trial court had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10894 - 2017-09-20
CA Blank Order
) whether trial counsel was ineffective when Ebony L. declined to contest three of the four elements
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118154 - 2014-07-29
) whether trial counsel was ineffective when Ebony L. declined to contest three of the four elements
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118154 - 2014-07-29
State v. Steven T. Moore
to provide a legal breath sample. ¶7 The trial court conducted a refusal hearing on June 1, 2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17853 - 2005-04-26
to provide a legal breath sample. ¶7 The trial court conducted a refusal hearing on June 1, 2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17853 - 2005-04-26
State v. Derrick E. Hopkins
” § 941.23. (Uppercasing omitted.) He also contends that the trial court erroneously denied his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4502 - 2005-03-31
” § 941.23. (Uppercasing omitted.) He also contends that the trial court erroneously denied his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4502 - 2005-03-31
State v. George F. Savage
contends that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress,[3] claiming that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2968 - 2005-03-31
contends that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress,[3] claiming that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2968 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Derrick E. Hopkins
“effectively repealed” § 941.23. (Uppercasing omitted.) He also contends that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4502 - 2017-09-19
“effectively repealed” § 941.23. (Uppercasing omitted.) He also contends that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4502 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
of this appeal. He claimed: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion during the post-revocation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31175 - 2007-12-12
of this appeal. He claimed: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion during the post-revocation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31175 - 2007-12-12