Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21671 - 21680 of 82664 for case codes/1000.
Search results 21671 - 21680 of 82664 for case codes/1000.
State v. Peter R. Burgeson
case in Waukesha County that he wanted to know the outcome of before proceeding with the instant case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13136 - 2005-03-31
case in Waukesha County that he wanted to know the outcome of before proceeding with the instant case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13136 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Huss argues the circuit court erred in both cases by rejecting his collateral attack on three of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100149 - 2013-07-29
. Huss argues the circuit court erred in both cases by rejecting his collateral attack on three of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100149 - 2013-07-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=638833 - 2023-03-29
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=638833 - 2023-03-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=286985 - 2020-09-16
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=286985 - 2020-09-16
[PDF]
State v. Shawn Schulpius
2001 WI 69 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 00-0095 Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16350 - 2017-09-21
2001 WI 69 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 00-0095 Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16350 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. We conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238399 - 2019-03-29
. We conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238399 - 2019-03-29
COURT OF APPEALS
, “present[ed] a prima facie case” that Darrow was liable on her claim. Murray has not given us a transcript
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54834 - 2006-11-20
, “present[ed] a prima facie case” that Darrow was liable on her claim. Murray has not given us a transcript
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54834 - 2006-11-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as are necessary on remand, consistent with this opinion. BACKGROUND ¶3 Richer was charged in the present case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=367906 - 2021-05-18
as are necessary on remand, consistent with this opinion. BACKGROUND ¶3 Richer was charged in the present case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=367906 - 2021-05-18
[PDF]
WI App 20
2020 WI App 20 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2018AP1037
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257968 - 2020-06-15
2020 WI App 20 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2018AP1037
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257968 - 2020-06-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and the “value of permanency” for him out of the case; and (3) erroneously elicited detrimental testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=920348 - 2025-02-26
and the “value of permanency” for him out of the case; and (3) erroneously elicited detrimental testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=920348 - 2025-02-26