Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21671 - 21680 of 29823 for des.
Search results 21671 - 21680 of 29823 for des.
Robert Pasko v. City of Milwaukee
. ¶6 Our review of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15960 - 2005-03-31
. ¶6 Our review of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15960 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law that we review de novo. Nowell v. City of Wausau, 2013 WI 88, ¶19, 351 Wis. 2d 1, 838
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=300018 - 2020-10-29
a question of law that we review de novo. Nowell v. City of Wausau, 2013 WI 88, ¶19, 351 Wis. 2d 1, 838
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=300018 - 2020-10-29
COURT OF APPEALS
motion is sufficient to entitle the defendant to an evidentiary hearing is reviewed de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93295 - 2013-02-25
motion is sufficient to entitle the defendant to an evidentiary hearing is reviewed de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93295 - 2013-02-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, Beerbohm asserts, we should review de novo the meaning of “public interest” in § 302.1135, and whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105841 - 2017-09-21
, Beerbohm asserts, we should review de novo the meaning of “public interest” in § 302.1135, and whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105841 - 2017-09-21
State v. Nathan Speers
, which we review de novo based on the facts as found by the trial court. In determining whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17730 - 2005-05-02
, which we review de novo based on the facts as found by the trial court. In determining whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17730 - 2005-05-02
[PDF]
Thomas G. Schanke v. Mitchell Street State Bank
unless clearly erroneous. WIS. STAT. § 805.17(2) (1999-2000). We review questions of law de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4073 - 2017-09-20
unless clearly erroneous. WIS. STAT. § 805.17(2) (1999-2000). We review questions of law de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4073 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Paul Alan LeRose
prejudiced the defendant is a question of law which we review de novo without deference to the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15681 - 2017-09-21
prejudiced the defendant is a question of law which we review de novo without deference to the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15681 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
such questions de novo. Id. Nos. 2022AP1778-CR 2022AP1779-CR 5 We begin with Dickey’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=862199 - 2024-10-17
such questions de novo. Id. Nos. 2022AP1778-CR 2022AP1779-CR 5 We begin with Dickey’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=862199 - 2024-10-17
WI App 29 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2014AP130 Complete Title o...
of governmental immunity, and its exceptions, to a given set of facts is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136383 - 2015-04-28
of governmental immunity, and its exceptions, to a given set of facts is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136383 - 2015-04-28
State v. Quincy Ferguson
of a statute is a matter of law which we review de novo, benefitting from the analyses of the circuit court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16953 - 2005-03-31
of a statute is a matter of law which we review de novo, benefitting from the analyses of the circuit court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16953 - 2005-03-31