Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21671 - 21680 of 64694 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 21671 - 21680 of 64694 for divorce records/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Chris Lamar Crittendon
members and to the State’s reference to gang members was unsupported by the record. It explained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7228 - 2017-09-20
members and to the State’s reference to gang members was unsupported by the record. It explained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7228 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the informant a transmitter and video recorder along with $200 in prerecorded buy money. The informant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171258 - 2017-09-21
the informant a transmitter and video recorder along with $200 in prerecorded buy money. The informant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171258 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was sent a copy of the report, but he has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179286 - 2017-09-21
was sent a copy of the report, but he has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179286 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
made findings “to clarify the record” but expressly took no position as to whether those findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108145 - 2017-09-21
made findings “to clarify the record” but expressly took no position as to whether those findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108145 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Lawrence P. Peters, Jr.
, because the record reflects an arguable right-to-counsel violation, which is clearly established
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17536 - 2017-09-21
, because the record reflects an arguable right-to-counsel violation, which is clearly established
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17536 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
; and the circuit court erroneously denied its motion to supplement the record. We reject Gage’s arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67345 - 2014-09-15
; and the circuit court erroneously denied its motion to supplement the record. We reject Gage’s arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67345 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgments may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112883 - 2017-09-21
independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgments may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112883 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
that the record did not support that assertion but, if a motion to withdraw his plea were filed, the court would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28749 - 2014-09-15
that the record did not support that assertion but, if a motion to withdraw his plea were filed, the court would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28749 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
be conducted on the record to help ensure that they are knowing, voluntary, and intelligent. Klessig, 211
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=558959 - 2022-08-25
be conducted on the record to help ensure that they are knowing, voluntary, and intelligent. Klessig, 211
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=558959 - 2022-08-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the benefit of listening to an audio recording of discussion between the deputy and Hechimovich following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62519 - 2014-09-15
the benefit of listening to an audio recording of discussion between the deputy and Hechimovich following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62519 - 2014-09-15