Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21671 - 21680 of 28806 for f.
Search results 21671 - 21680 of 28806 for f.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
” shows a violation of the fair cross-section requirement. Id.; see also United States v. Weaver, 267 F
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205013 - 2017-12-13
” shows a violation of the fair cross-section requirement. Id.; see also United States v. Weaver, 267 F
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205013 - 2017-12-13
State v. Bernard E. Burgess
of sentence modification, a new factor is a: [F]act or set of facts highly relevant to the imposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3279 - 2005-03-31
of sentence modification, a new factor is a: [F]act or set of facts highly relevant to the imposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3279 - 2005-03-31
Arlene M. Wolski v. Chris R. Wolski
was submitted on the brief of Frederick F. Klimetz of Greendale. COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10246 - 2005-03-31
was submitted on the brief of Frederick F. Klimetz of Greendale. COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10246 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
at sentencing, her “goal at that point was to minimize his prison time.” She testified: “[F]rankly, I just
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61779 - 2011-03-28
at sentencing, her “goal at that point was to minimize his prison time.” She testified: “[F]rankly, I just
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61779 - 2011-03-28
State v. Johnnie Phiffer
judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(f), Stats. [2] The judge hearing the postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14410 - 2005-03-31
judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(f), Stats. [2] The judge hearing the postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14410 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
related to the adoption, Alicia L. testified that she thought, “[I]f I drop out of everything … that I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104730 - 2013-11-26
related to the adoption, Alicia L. testified that she thought, “[I]f I drop out of everything … that I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104730 - 2013-11-26
[PDF]
State v. James A. Sybers
for 1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2001-02). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5360 - 2017-09-19
for 1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2001-02). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5360 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Lawrence Turkow v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
general, and Joanne F. Kloppenburg, assistant attorney general, of Madison. Respondent ATTORNEYS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12383 - 2017-09-21
general, and Joanne F. Kloppenburg, assistant attorney general, of Madison. Respondent ATTORNEYS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12383 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
income producing enterprises” in the future. See § 767.56(1c)(e), (f). ¶23 Based on the “evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121432 - 2014-09-15
income producing enterprises” in the future. See § 767.56(1c)(e), (f). ¶23 Based on the “evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121432 - 2014-09-15
WI App 67 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP752-CR Complete Title ...
explained: [F]irst and foremost I would like to address the plea agreement .… I did call [Tucker’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82910 - 2012-06-26
explained: [F]irst and foremost I would like to address the plea agreement .… I did call [Tucker’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82910 - 2012-06-26