Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21671 - 21680 of 45800 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 21671 - 21680 of 45800 for paternity test paper work.
COURT OF APPEALS
). We need not address both components of the test if the defendant fails to make a sufficient showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97025 - 2013-05-21
). We need not address both components of the test if the defendant fails to make a sufficient showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97025 - 2013-05-21
State v. Michael D. Soulier
error in sustaining the State’s objection was harmless. The test for harmless error is “whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6917 - 2005-03-31
error in sustaining the State’s objection was harmless. The test for harmless error is “whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6917 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
on considerations of reasonableness, and [courts] apply an objective test when making this determination.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130148 - 2014-11-24
on considerations of reasonableness, and [courts] apply an objective test when making this determination.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130148 - 2014-11-24
COURT OF APPEALS
of reasonableness, and we apply an objective test. The test is “[w]hether a police officer under the circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29587 - 2007-07-04
of reasonableness, and we apply an objective test. The test is “[w]hether a police officer under the circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29587 - 2007-07-04
State v. Trenton McAdoo
with affidavits or additional support, for failing to have DNA testing performed by an out-of-state laboratory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13311 - 2005-03-31
with affidavits or additional support, for failing to have DNA testing performed by an out-of-state laboratory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13311 - 2005-03-31
State v. Outagamie County Board of Adjustment
the “unnecessarily burdensome” test under State v. Kenosha County Bd. of Adjust., 212 Wis.2d 310, 569 N.W.2d 54 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13879 - 2005-03-31
the “unnecessarily burdensome” test under State v. Kenosha County Bd. of Adjust., 212 Wis.2d 310, 569 N.W.2d 54 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13879 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
intoxication through field sobriety tests and an evidentiary blood draw. Lisiecki was consequently charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29763 - 2014-09-15
intoxication through field sobriety tests and an evidentiary blood draw. Lisiecki was consequently charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29763 - 2014-09-15
2007 WI APP 195
, it is not without exceptions. Walton, 361 F.3d at 433. A trial may be closed only when the test set out in Press
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29514 - 2007-08-27
, it is not without exceptions. Walton, 361 F.3d at 433. A trial may be closed only when the test set out in Press
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29514 - 2007-08-27
COURT OF APPEALS
. The court denied Volkaitis’s claim that trial counsel was ineffective. ¶5 The two-part test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30973 - 2007-11-27
. The court denied Volkaitis’s claim that trial counsel was ineffective. ¶5 The two-part test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30973 - 2007-11-27
COURT OF APPEALS
. Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694. We may address the tests in the order we choose. ¶6 In order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33551 - 2008-07-28
. Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694. We may address the tests in the order we choose. ¶6 In order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33551 - 2008-07-28