Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21681 - 21690 of 67826 for law.

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - September 2006
Law, which provides that certain sex offenders may be held indefinitely under civil law in locked
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26406 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - November 2006
by applying current Wisconsin law. The Wisconsin Supreme Court, as the state's preeminent law- developing
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27011 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Stephen R. Hart
). These are mixed questions of fact and law. Id. at 698. We will not reverse a trial court's findings of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8129 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
reference to God, noting “it isn’t God that has bestowed [this task on the jury]; it’s the law, our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=516374 - 2022-05-03

[PDF] Patrick D. Affeldt v. Yehuda Elmakias
or with an advisory jury, the court shall find the ultimate facts and state separately its conclusions of law thereon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12307 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
standard of review, we review the pertinent statute and case law, and finally we address and reject each
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149309 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI App 22
of law we review de novo. Awve v. Physicians Ins. Co. of Wis., 181 Wis. 2d 815, 821, 512 N.W.2d 216
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=511962 - 2022-06-08

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
involved the review of a Mississippi No. 2020AP1519-CR 5 common-law rule that a party may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=468381 - 2021-12-29

Otto Wolter v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
weight, due weight or de novo¾to an agency’s conclusions of law and statutory interpretation. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15247 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Walter Junior Hamilton
. § 893.40 applied. Relying on case law, the court determined that the State’s cause of action accrued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3841 - 2017-09-20