Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21681 - 21690 of 46040 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 21681 - 21690 of 46040 for paternity test paper work.
State v. Courtney J.R.
evidence met the two-pronged test for admission, we affirm. Additionally, because the defendant failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12514 - 2005-03-31
evidence met the two-pronged test for admission, we affirm. Additionally, because the defendant failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12514 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth Moffett
are multiplicitous is a question of law that we review de novo based on a two-fold test. First, we examine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15969 - 2017-09-21
are multiplicitous is a question of law that we review de novo based on a two-fold test. First, we examine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15969 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of intoxicants on Backman’s breath and observed that Backman’s eyes were “red.” During field sobriety tests
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210424 - 2018-04-03
of intoxicants on Backman’s breath and observed that Backman’s eyes were “red.” During field sobriety tests
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210424 - 2018-04-03
State v. Gregory L. Cundy
. When Cundy failed field sobriety tests, Walston arrested him for OMVWI. When Cundy failed a blood test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2590 - 2005-03-31
. When Cundy failed field sobriety tests, Walston arrested him for OMVWI. When Cundy failed a blood test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2590 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
, we reject these arguments. We turn first to Ashmore’s evidentiary argument. The test on certiorari
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142793 - 2015-06-01
, we reject these arguments. We turn first to Ashmore’s evidentiary argument. The test on certiorari
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142793 - 2015-06-01
State v. Donnis J.
). The test as to whether words tend to cause or provoke a disturbance and thus become fighting words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13781 - 2005-03-31
). The test as to whether words tend to cause or provoke a disturbance and thus become fighting words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13781 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jonathan R. Blount
. Wisconsin analyzes claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel using the two-prong test set forth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8730 - 2005-03-31
. Wisconsin analyzes claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel using the two-prong test set forth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8730 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
“was there any DNA test done on the victim” and “was [his] DNA found in or on the victim.”4 ¶9 In our opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36852 - 2014-09-15
“was there any DNA test done on the victim” and “was [his] DNA found in or on the victim.”4 ¶9 In our opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36852 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Martin Patterson
sobriety test of the driver. The critical determination on appeal is whether the search of Patterson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10235 - 2017-09-20
sobriety test of the driver. The critical determination on appeal is whether the search of Patterson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10235 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The test to determine whether newly discovered evidence warrants a new trial has five factors: (1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192178 - 2017-09-21
. The test to determine whether newly discovered evidence warrants a new trial has five factors: (1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192178 - 2017-09-21