Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21691 - 21700 of 83957 for case number.
Search results 21691 - 21700 of 83957 for case number.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is entitled to receive credit against his sentence after revocation in a Sauk County criminal case under WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=472272 - 2022-01-13
is entitled to receive credit against his sentence after revocation in a Sauk County criminal case under WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=472272 - 2022-01-13
[PDF]
Colecta Mireles v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
2000 WI 96 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 98-1607 Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17408 - 2017-09-21
2000 WI 96 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 98-1607 Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17408 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, as Daniel was taking a large number of medications. Bales found Daniel to be dangerous, referencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=429055 - 2021-09-21
, as Daniel was taking a large number of medications. Bales found Daniel to be dangerous, referencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=429055 - 2021-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 113
2010 WI APP 113 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2009AP1822-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51759 - 2014-09-15
2010 WI APP 113 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2009AP1822-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51759 - 2014-09-15
State v. Gamel S. Hegwood
. BACKGROUND ¶2 The underlying facts of this case are somewhat involved. According
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5491 - 2005-03-31
. BACKGROUND ¶2 The underlying facts of this case are somewhat involved. According
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5491 - 2005-03-31
State v. John A. Lettice
PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96‑0140‑CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10249 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96‑0140‑CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10249 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED.” Accordingly, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case arises following the sale
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38744 - 2009-08-03
EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED.” Accordingly, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case arises following the sale
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38744 - 2009-08-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the appeal because the appellate brief had a number of “defective flaws” and Robin, along with an attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256931 - 2020-04-14
the appeal because the appellate brief had a number of “defective flaws” and Robin, along with an attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256931 - 2020-04-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for relief, numbered consecutively (a) through (h). In the present case, Young’s motion to vacate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185799 - 2017-09-21
for relief, numbered consecutively (a) through (h). In the present case, Young’s motion to vacate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185799 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
or sentence modification. We reject his arguments and affirm. ¶2 This case involves two consolidated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47677 - 2014-09-15
or sentence modification. We reject his arguments and affirm. ¶2 This case involves two consolidated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47677 - 2014-09-15