Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21691 - 21700 of 30242 for de.
Search results 21691 - 21700 of 30242 for de.
[PDF]
WI APP 109
of summary judgment de novo, and we use the same methodology as did the circuit court. Cole v. Hubanks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65781 - 2014-09-15
of summary judgment de novo, and we use the same methodology as did the circuit court. Cole v. Hubanks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65781 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that right is a constitutional question that is reviewed de novo. Id. ¶28 To prevail on an inaccurate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=342677 - 2021-03-09
that right is a constitutional question that is reviewed de novo. Id. ¶28 To prevail on an inaccurate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=342677 - 2021-03-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 FITZPATRICK
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=606158 - 2022-12-30
a judgment of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 FITZPATRICK
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=606158 - 2022-12-30
[PDF]
State v. Tom Sweeney
," it "ma[de] no sense" for him to argue personally to the court with only a "limited understanding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10020 - 2017-09-19
," it "ma[de] no sense" for him to argue personally to the court with only a "limited understanding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10020 - 2017-09-19
William C. Frazier v. Jeffrey W. Senglaub
. Senglaub appeals. SUMMARY JUDGMENT ¶11 This court reviews summary judgments de novo, employing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19977 - 2005-10-18
. Senglaub appeals. SUMMARY JUDGMENT ¶11 This court reviews summary judgments de novo, employing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19977 - 2005-10-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
we review de novo. Fonte, 281 Wis. 2d 654, ¶9. We will reverse a conviction and order a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70321 - 2014-09-15
we review de novo. Fonte, 281 Wis. 2d 654, ¶9. We will reverse a conviction and order a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70321 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, if No. 2013AP103-CR 10 true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103615 - 2017-09-21
, if No. 2013AP103-CR 10 true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103615 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Clayton Ganser v. Claudia Schwartz
We review the granting and denial of motions for summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12757 - 2017-09-21
We review the granting and denial of motions for summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12757 - 2017-09-21
State v. Dennis P. Smith
law that we decide de novo. Id., ¶11. We conclude the record establishes a proper waiver of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19393 - 2005-08-24
law that we decide de novo. Id., ¶11. We conclude the record establishes a proper waiver of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19393 - 2005-08-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
6 ¶12 We review de novo the question of whether proffered evidence is evidence of “prior sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238199 - 2019-03-28
6 ¶12 We review de novo the question of whether proffered evidence is evidence of “prior sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238199 - 2019-03-28