Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21691 - 21700 of 29823 for des.
Search results 21691 - 21700 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
State v. James Held
a suspect’s request for an additional test was sufficient is a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2617 - 2017-09-19
a suspect’s request for an additional test was sufficient is a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2617 - 2017-09-19
State v. Julio G.
the proper legal standard governing termination of parental rights presents a question of law subject to de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5280 - 2005-03-31
the proper legal standard governing termination of parental rights presents a question of law subject to de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5280 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Derrick Sandles
of reasonableness is a question of law, which [this court] review[s] de novo.” State v. Young, 212 Wis. 2d 417
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5719 - 2017-09-19
of reasonableness is a question of law, which [this court] review[s] de novo.” State v. Young, 212 Wis. 2d 417
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5719 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Steven C. Tietsworth v. Harley-Davidson, Inc.
for failure to state a claim is a question of law reviewed by this court de novo; this court “accepts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5170 - 2017-09-19
for failure to state a claim is a question of law reviewed by this court de novo; this court “accepts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5170 - 2017-09-19
Peter Finn v. Nachreiner Boie Art Factory
conclusions. Our review is de novo. See Peterman v. Midwestern Nat'l Ins. Co., 177 Wis.2d 682, 691, 503 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9316 - 2005-03-31
conclusions. Our review is de novo. See Peterman v. Midwestern Nat'l Ins. Co., 177 Wis.2d 682, 691, 503 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9316 - 2005-03-31
State v. David Guzman
was deficient and prejudicial” de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121, 127‑28, 449 N.W.2d 845 (1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15351 - 2005-03-31
was deficient and prejudicial” de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121, 127‑28, 449 N.W.2d 845 (1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15351 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Timothy Cepukenas v. Shelli L. Cepukenas
is a question of law which we review de novo. See Ball v. District No. 4, Area Bd., 117 Wis.2d 529, 537, 345
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12662 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law which we review de novo. See Ball v. District No. 4, Area Bd., 117 Wis.2d 529, 537, 345
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12662 - 2017-09-21
State v. Ary L. Jones, Sr.
Jones’ double jeopardy protections have been violated is a question of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4558 - 2005-03-31
Jones’ double jeopardy protections have been violated is a question of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4558 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Jonathan Reuter v. Theresa M. Murphy
for Dane County: ROBERT DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Affirmed. Before Dykman, P.J., Deininger, J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16342 - 2017-09-21
for Dane County: ROBERT DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Affirmed. Before Dykman, P.J., Deininger, J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16342 - 2017-09-21
Carla B. v. Timothy N.
it. The interpretation of a statute is a question of law we review de novo. See Grosse v. Protective Life Ins. Co., 182
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15327 - 2005-03-31
it. The interpretation of a statute is a question of law we review de novo. See Grosse v. Protective Life Ins. Co., 182
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15327 - 2005-03-31