Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21691 - 21700 of 88189 for n v.

Wisconsin Court System - Court of Appeals opinion search results
District County Select/view Nov 19, 2025 2025AP000054 Kristin N. Kappl v. Christopher F. Kappl 2 Waukesha
/other/appeals/caopin.jsp?SortBy=date&begin_date=11/19/2025&end_date=11/19/2025¬iceTypeCode=SMD

Wisconsin Court System - Court of Appeals opinion search results
District County Select/view Feb 27, 2026 2025AP002382 Grant County Department of Social Services v. D. G. N
/other/appeals/caopin.jsp?SortBy=date&begin_date=02/27/2026&end_date=02/27/2026

Wisconsin Court System - Court of Appeals opinion search results
, 2024 2022AP002084 State v. Casey J. Shelton 4 Green PDF Feb 08, 2024 2021AP001437 State v. M. L. J. N
/other/appeals/caopin.jsp?SortBy=date&begin_date=02/08/2024&end_date=02/08/2024

Wisconsin Court System - Court of Appeals opinion search results
District County Select/view Jul 10, 2025 2024AP001166 Jackson County DHS v. A. M. N. 4 Jackson PDF Jul 10
/other/appeals/caopin.jsp?SortBy=date&begin_date=07/10/2025&end_date=07/10/2025

COURT OF APPEALS
-Respondent, v. Michael L., Respondent-Appellant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32347 - 2008-04-08

[PDF] State v. Carlos Perez
of Case: In re the Return of Property in: State of Wisconsin v. Carlos Perez: State of Wisconsin
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17572 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Jesse Franklin
State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent v. Jesse Franklin, Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17490 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 57
Harnischfeger Corp. v. LIRC, 196 Wis. 2d 650, 660 n.4, 539 N.W.2d 98 (1995)). ¶14 “No deference is due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80369 - 2014-09-15

WI App 57 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP938 Complete Title of ...
Harnischfeger Corp. v. LIRC, 196 Wis. 2d 650, 660 n.4, 539 N.W.2d 98 (1995)). ¶14 “No deference is due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80369 - 2012-05-30

COURT OF APPEALS
the propriety of summary judgment in any particular case.” Id., ¶37 n.4. Ultimately, the Steven V. court held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93091 - 2013-02-19