Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2171 - 2180 of 4807 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu Baja Double Batang Batang Sumenep.
Search results 2171 - 2180 of 4807 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu Baja Double Batang Batang Sumenep.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
rights other than a double jeopardy issue that could be resolved based upon the record. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=669757 - 2023-06-20
rights other than a double jeopardy issue that could be resolved based upon the record. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=669757 - 2023-06-20
State v. Travis E. Blanks
imposed the repeater status in pronouncing sentence, and (3) double jeopardy. The circuit court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6916 - 2005-03-31
imposed the repeater status in pronouncing sentence, and (3) double jeopardy. The circuit court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6916 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Juan S. Torres
, which doubled his potential maximum prison time. See State v. Young, 180 Wis.2d 700, 702-03, 511 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10058 - 2017-09-19
, which doubled his potential maximum prison time. See State v. Young, 180 Wis.2d 700, 702-03, 511 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10058 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
sentence after a five-year probationary period constituted double jeopardy. The circuit denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31051 - 2014-09-15
sentence after a five-year probationary period constituted double jeopardy. The circuit denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31051 - 2014-09-15
State v. Shawn Schulpius
that as applied to Schulpius, Wis. Stat. Ch. 980 presented an unconstitutional violation of the double jeopardy
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16350 - 2005-03-31
that as applied to Schulpius, Wis. Stat. Ch. 980 presented an unconstitutional violation of the double jeopardy
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16350 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
sentence credit, he would have been awarded double credit. When consecutive sentences are imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101500 - 2017-09-21
sentence credit, he would have been awarded double credit. When consecutive sentences are imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101500 - 2017-09-21
State v. Travis E. Blanks
sentence, and (3) double jeopardy. All were rejected on grounds that he could have raised the issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20872 - 2006-01-10
sentence, and (3) double jeopardy. All were rejected on grounds that he could have raised the issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20872 - 2006-01-10
COURT OF APPEALS
for materials paid for by the Derricks could double-count the cost of materials. Third, if we infer from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107304 - 2014-01-28
for materials paid for by the Derricks could double-count the cost of materials. Third, if we infer from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107304 - 2014-01-28
CA Blank Order
to double back and find a better position to be able to follow the car. By the time the officer pulled
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102036 - 2013-09-15
to double back and find a better position to be able to follow the car. By the time the officer pulled
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102036 - 2013-09-15
[PDF]
Albert Winfrey v. Gordon A. Abrahamson
to be free from double jeopardy. We reject the arguments. The charges in Reukauf's conduct report were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8029 - 2017-09-19
to be free from double jeopardy. We reject the arguments. The charges in Reukauf's conduct report were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8029 - 2017-09-19