Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2171 - 2180 of 13657 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu Baja Fortress Double Door Wlingi Blitar.
Search results 2171 - 2180 of 13657 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu Baja Fortress Double Door Wlingi Blitar.
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
unlocked the door, he did not have an expectation of privacy that society is willing to recognize
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33800 - 2008-09-23
unlocked the door, he did not have an expectation of privacy that society is willing to recognize
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33800 - 2008-09-23
[PDF]
WI APP 143
conclude Neitzel did not have standing because, at the time the officers unlocked the door, he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33800 - 2014-09-15
conclude Neitzel did not have standing because, at the time the officers unlocked the door, he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33800 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
the Double Jeopardy Clause; (3) the ALJ’s “time” credit calculations were incorrect; and (4) he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1084172 - 2026-03-04
the Double Jeopardy Clause; (3) the ALJ’s “time” credit calculations were incorrect; and (4) he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1084172 - 2026-03-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
case. Here, the statutes set a mandatory minimum fine of $600, doubled to $1,200 because Gurtowski’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=679980 - 2023-07-19
case. Here, the statutes set a mandatory minimum fine of $600, doubled to $1,200 because Gurtowski’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=679980 - 2023-07-19
Michael Cornwell v. David H. Schwarz
offender rules violates double jeopardy, ex post facto law and due process constitutional protections. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21485 - 2006-02-21
offender rules violates double jeopardy, ex post facto law and due process constitutional protections. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21485 - 2006-02-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
noting that this figure would be further subject to statutory doubling. While neither party has cited
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980070 - 2025-07-09
noting that this figure would be further subject to statutory doubling. While neither party has cited
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980070 - 2025-07-09
State v. David G. Alexander
was barred by the double-jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment as a result of the prior administrative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11091 - 2005-03-31
was barred by the double-jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment as a result of the prior administrative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11091 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Michael Cornwell v. David H. Schwarz
was insufficient for revocation and that requiring his compliance with sexual offender rules violates double
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21485 - 2017-09-21
was insufficient for revocation and that requiring his compliance with sexual offender rules violates double
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21485 - 2017-09-21
State v. Debra L. Van Riper
Van Riper was a repeater, the penalty enhancer doubled the maximum possible fines and terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13283 - 2005-03-31
Van Riper was a repeater, the penalty enhancer doubled the maximum possible fines and terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13283 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
noting that this figure would be further subject to statutory doubling. While neither party has cited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980070 - 2025-07-09
noting that this figure would be further subject to statutory doubling. While neither party has cited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980070 - 2025-07-09