Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2171 - 2180 of 13650 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu Baja Fortress Double Door Wlingi Blitar.
Search results 2171 - 2180 of 13650 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu Baja Fortress Double Door Wlingi Blitar.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of a violation of the constitutional right to a speedy trial. Double jeopardy did not attach here. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=675322 - 2023-07-05
of a violation of the constitutional right to a speedy trial. Double jeopardy did not attach here. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=675322 - 2023-07-05
COURT OF APPEALS
that application of the consecutive sentence to both of the concurrent sentences violates double jeopardy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33010 - 2008-06-11
that application of the consecutive sentence to both of the concurrent sentences violates double jeopardy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33010 - 2008-06-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
stated that Gordee was driving evasively. Rather, Gordee contends, he was doubling back on his route
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1143409 - 2026-07-09
stated that Gordee was driving evasively. Rather, Gordee contends, he was doubling back on his route
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1143409 - 2026-07-09
COURT OF APPEALS
an order denying his claim for double his security deposit, costs, and attorney fees, and granting Jeff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30681 - 2007-10-22
an order denying his claim for double his security deposit, costs, and attorney fees, and granting Jeff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30681 - 2007-10-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is true of Fowler’s contention that his convictions are multiplicitous and violated double jeopardy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74190 - 2014-09-15
is true of Fowler’s contention that his convictions are multiplicitous and violated double jeopardy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74190 - 2014-09-15
State v. Debra L. Van Riper
Van Riper was a repeater, the penalty enhancer doubled the maximum possible fines and terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13283 - 2005-03-31
Van Riper was a repeater, the penalty enhancer doubled the maximum possible fines and terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13283 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Heather M. M.
the separation of powers doctrine. ¶10 The State raises the issue of double jeopardy at the end of its brief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4002 - 2017-09-20
the separation of powers doctrine. ¶10 The State raises the issue of double jeopardy at the end of its brief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4002 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 28, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Ap...
) double jeopardy; (3) judicial bias; (4) extortion; (5) unprofessional prosecutorial conduct; and (6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107322 - 2014-01-27
) double jeopardy; (3) judicial bias; (4) extortion; (5) unprofessional prosecutorial conduct; and (6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107322 - 2014-01-27
State v. David G. Alexander
was barred by the double-jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment as a result of the prior administrative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11091 - 2005-03-31
was barred by the double-jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment as a result of the prior administrative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11091 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
the Double Jeopardy Clause; (3) the ALJ’s “time” credit calculations were incorrect; and (4) he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1084172 - 2026-03-04
the Double Jeopardy Clause; (3) the ALJ’s “time” credit calculations were incorrect; and (4) he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1084172 - 2026-03-04