Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2171 - 2180 of 30059 for de.
Search results 2171 - 2180 of 30059 for de.
[PDF]
State v. Dante R. Voss
, which we review de novo; whether a new factor warrants a sentence modification is committed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18388 - 2017-09-21
, which we review de novo; whether a new factor warrants a sentence modification is committed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18388 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, which is a question of law that we review de novo. Estate of Rille v. Physicians Ins. Co., 2007 WI 36
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191967 - 2017-09-21
, which is a question of law that we review de novo. Estate of Rille v. Physicians Ins. Co., 2007 WI 36
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191967 - 2017-09-21
Joshua K. v. Nancy K.
that in de Montigny v. de Montigny, 70 Wis.2d 131, 233 N.W.2d 463 (1975), the Wisconsin Supreme Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8437 - 2012-12-18
that in de Montigny v. de Montigny, 70 Wis.2d 131, 233 N.W.2d 463 (1975), the Wisconsin Supreme Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8437 - 2012-12-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
they are clearly erroneous, but we review the constitutionality of a search or seizure de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131304 - 2017-09-21
they are clearly erroneous, but we review the constitutionality of a search or seizure de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131304 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
County: robert p. van de hey, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 LUNDSTEN, J.[1] Travanti Schmidt appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121951 - 2014-09-17
County: robert p. van de hey, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 LUNDSTEN, J.[1] Travanti Schmidt appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121951 - 2014-09-17
[PDF]
NOTICE
of law that we review de novo. State v. Quarzenski, 2007 WI App 212, ¶19, 305 Wis. 2d 525, 739 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35337 - 2014-09-15
of law that we review de novo. State v. Quarzenski, 2007 WI App 212, ¶19, 305 Wis. 2d 525, 739 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35337 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
omitted). We review de novo whether evidence was sufficient to support a jury verdict. State v. Booker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90168 - 2014-09-15
omitted). We review de novo whether evidence was sufficient to support a jury verdict. State v. Booker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90168 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Joseph L. Van Patten
right to counsel. We review issues of constitutional fact de novo. See State v. Turner, 136 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11600 - 2017-09-19
right to counsel. We review issues of constitutional fact de novo. See State v. Turner, 136 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11600 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
version unless otherwise noted. No. 2016AP2222-CR 3 either an actual or de facto life
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210810 - 2018-04-11
version unless otherwise noted. No. 2016AP2222-CR 3 either an actual or de facto life
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210810 - 2018-04-11
[PDF]
NOTICE
reasonable suspicion is a question of law for our de novo review, contrary to what Fowler sometimes seems
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30997 - 2014-09-15
reasonable suspicion is a question of law for our de novo review, contrary to what Fowler sometimes seems
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30997 - 2014-09-15