Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2171 - 2180 of 50036 for our.
Search results 2171 - 2180 of 50036 for our.
State v. Michael Modrow
, it granted the state's petition for review, summarily reversed our decision in Modrow, and denied Modrow's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10220 - 2005-03-31
, it granted the state's petition for review, summarily reversed our decision in Modrow, and denied Modrow's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10220 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Dariell D. Cross
with counsel’s analysis of these issues. Our review of the record discloses that Cross’s guilty plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14404 - 2014-09-15
with counsel’s analysis of these issues. Our review of the record discloses that Cross’s guilty plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14404 - 2014-09-15
State v. Charles R. Wincek
), Stats. He also appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. In our first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10692 - 2005-03-31
), Stats. He also appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. In our first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10692 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of probation revocation is by petition for certiorari in circuit court). Our review is limited
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=623268 - 2023-02-22
of probation revocation is by petition for certiorari in circuit court). Our review is limited
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=623268 - 2023-02-22
CA Blank Order
motion for summary judgment and declaratory judgment. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146987 - 2015-08-19
motion for summary judgment and declaratory judgment. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146987 - 2015-08-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Drake was advised of her right to respond and has not responded. Upon our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211798 - 2018-04-25
. Drake was advised of her right to respond and has not responded. Upon our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211798 - 2018-04-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of this court, counsel has filed a supplemental no-merit report. On our review of the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=962535 - 2025-05-30
of this court, counsel has filed a supplemental no-merit report. On our review of the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=962535 - 2025-05-30
State v. Carl Mitchell
concludes that this possible issue has no arguable merit. Based upon our independent review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9744 - 2005-03-31
concludes that this possible issue has no arguable merit. Based upon our independent review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9744 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Mueller was advised of his right to respond and has failed to respond. Upon our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220312 - 2018-10-02
. Mueller was advised of his right to respond and has failed to respond. Upon our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220312 - 2018-10-02
[PDF]
State v. Charles R. Wincek
for NO. 96-1100-CR 2 postconviction relief. In our first decision on this appeal, we affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10692 - 2017-09-20
for NO. 96-1100-CR 2 postconviction relief. In our first decision on this appeal, we affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10692 - 2017-09-20