Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2171 - 2180 of 20363 for sai.
Search results 2171 - 2180 of 20363 for sai.
[PDF]
Dorothy L. Ostovich v. Robert Sanderson
by the court’s statement immediately following: “So, that point—I’m not saying that he’s sitting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13565 - 2017-09-21
by the court’s statement immediately following: “So, that point—I’m not saying that he’s sitting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13565 - 2017-09-21
State v. Douglas G. Skenandore
of intoxicants on Skenandore’s breath. Furthermore, while at the hospital, Vargo heard Skenandore say that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4410 - 2005-03-31
of intoxicants on Skenandore’s breath. Furthermore, while at the hospital, Vargo heard Skenandore say that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4410 - 2005-03-31
State v. Anthony Doral Williams
their verdict: THE COURT: So say you all? JURORS: Yes. After completing a general poll of the jury, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10341 - 2005-03-31
their verdict: THE COURT: So say you all? JURORS: Yes. After completing a general poll of the jury, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10341 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
circumstances haven’t really changed. That’s always been there I guess is what I’m saying, although she’s doing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73910 - 2011-11-14
circumstances haven’t really changed. That’s always been there I guess is what I’m saying, although she’s doing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73910 - 2011-11-14
[PDF]
NOTICE
—to undergo a subsequent test.” He concluded his direct examination by saying the response from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31980 - 2014-09-15
—to undergo a subsequent test.” He concluded his direct examination by saying the response from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31980 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
be reevaluated in at most two years, the circuit court stated “[t]hat isn’t, to me, an opinion that says registry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71621 - 2011-10-04
be reevaluated in at most two years, the circuit court stated “[t]hat isn’t, to me, an opinion that says registry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71621 - 2011-10-04
Curran v. Jeannine Pemberton
done. You never get to raise those issues. Perhaps, another court’s going to look at this and say
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13170 - 2005-03-31
done. You never get to raise those issues. Perhaps, another court’s going to look at this and say
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13170 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, it suffices to say that a jury convicted Lipscomb of first-degree intentional homicide for the 2002 shooting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=768590 - 2024-02-27
, it suffices to say that a jury convicted Lipscomb of first-degree intentional homicide for the 2002 shooting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=768590 - 2024-02-27
State v. Eric W. Raye
this as your verdict, maybe as a result of compromise or some other considerations, but if you are saying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7394 - 2005-03-31
this as your verdict, maybe as a result of compromise or some other considerations, but if you are saying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7394 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
was prejudiced by counsel’s performance. The court was essentially saying that, even if trial counsel had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118835 - 2014-07-30
was prejudiced by counsel’s performance. The court was essentially saying that, even if trial counsel had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118835 - 2014-07-30