Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21701 - 21710 of 29821 for des.
Search results 21701 - 21710 of 29821 for des.
State v. Lana Lanser
of law de novo. See State v. Wilson, 170 Wis.2d 720, 722, 490 N.W.2d 48, 50 (Ct. App. 1992). We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15498 - 2005-03-31
of law de novo. See State v. Wilson, 170 Wis.2d 720, 722, 490 N.W.2d 48, 50 (Ct. App. 1992). We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15498 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id. ¶20 Here, for the reasons that follow, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980592 - 2025-07-10
is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id. ¶20 Here, for the reasons that follow, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980592 - 2025-07-10
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Ralph A. Kalal
Sosnay, 209 Wis. 2d 241, 243, 562 N.W.2d 137 (1997). We review the referee's conclusions of law de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19954 - 2005-10-13
Sosnay, 209 Wis. 2d 241, 243, 562 N.W.2d 137 (1997). We review the referee's conclusions of law de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19954 - 2005-10-13
State v. Randolph P. Haushalter
. The standard of review of a question concerning the interpretation of a statue is de novo. See State v. Irish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15125 - 2005-03-31
. The standard of review of a question concerning the interpretation of a statue is de novo. See State v. Irish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15125 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Cadott Education Association v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
to "due weight" or "great bearing." The lowest level of review, the de novo standard, is applied where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8753 - 2017-09-19
to "due weight" or "great bearing." The lowest level of review, the de novo standard, is applied where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8753 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
interpret right of first refusal language as we do other contract language, applying de novo review. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169972 - 2017-09-21
interpret right of first refusal language as we do other contract language, applying de novo review. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169972 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Ary L. Jones, Sr.
violated is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶9 The leading United States Supreme Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4558 - 2017-09-20
violated is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶9 The leading United States Supreme Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4558 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Id. We accept the circuit court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous but review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184754 - 2017-09-21
. Id. We accept the circuit court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous but review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184754 - 2017-09-21
Frontsheet
conclusions of law on a de novo basis. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Inglimo, 2007 WI 126, ¶5
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105746 - 2013-12-16
conclusions of law on a de novo basis. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Inglimo, 2007 WI 126, ¶5
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105746 - 2013-12-16
Jeanette E. Normington v. Peter J. Normington
on the interpretation of statutes or regulations in making its decision, we review those rulings de novo. See Weis v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16212 - 2005-03-31
on the interpretation of statutes or regulations in making its decision, we review those rulings de novo. See Weis v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16212 - 2005-03-31