Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21701 - 21710 of 29823 for des.
Search results 21701 - 21710 of 29823 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
. Second, we review the determination of reasonable suspicion de novo.” State v. Williams, 2001 WI 21, ¶18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88998 - 2012-11-05
. Second, we review the determination of reasonable suspicion de novo.” State v. Williams, 2001 WI 21, ¶18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88998 - 2012-11-05
[PDF]
State v. Randolph P. Haushalter
. The standard of review of a question concerning the interpretation of a statue is de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15123 - 2017-09-21
. The standard of review of a question concerning the interpretation of a statue is de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15123 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Shane M. Heimerl v. Waverly Beach, Inc.
or denial of summary judgment de novo. Waters v. United States Fid. & Guar. Co., 124 Wis. 2d 275, 278
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6320 - 2017-09-19
or denial of summary judgment de novo. Waters v. United States Fid. & Guar. Co., 124 Wis. 2d 275, 278
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6320 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a defendant has standing to raise a Fourth Amendment claim is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245266 - 2019-08-20
a defendant has standing to raise a Fourth Amendment claim is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245266 - 2019-08-20
[PDF]
Louis Zink, Jr. v. Akhatar Khwaja
is a question of statutory interpretation which we decide de novo. See Timm v. Portage County Drainage Dist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15014 - 2017-09-21
is a question of statutory interpretation which we decide de novo. See Timm v. Portage County Drainage Dist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15014 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 245
of a statute to a set of facts, a question of law is presented, and our review is de novo.” Id. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30502 - 2014-09-15
of a statute to a set of facts, a question of law is presented, and our review is de novo.” Id. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30502 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
The Estate of Robert Murray v. The Travelers Insurance Company
judgment is subject to de novo review by the appellate court. See Sauk County v. Employers Ins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13653 - 2017-09-21
judgment is subject to de novo review by the appellate court. See Sauk County v. Employers Ins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13653 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Randall K. Mataya
assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. See id. If we conclude on a threshold basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13671 - 2017-09-21
assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. See id. If we conclude on a threshold basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13671 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
William A. Pangman v. Shawano County
of law we review de novo. Juneau County, 221 Wis.2d at 639, 585 N.W.2d at 591. 6 We resolve all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13693 - 2014-09-15
of law we review de novo. Juneau County, 221 Wis.2d at 639, 585 N.W.2d at 591. 6 We resolve all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13693 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). We review this question de novo. State v. Giminski, 2001 WI App 211, ¶11, 247 Wis. 2d 750, 634
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191966 - 2017-09-21
). We review this question de novo. State v. Giminski, 2001 WI App 211, ¶11, 247 Wis. 2d 750, 634
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191966 - 2017-09-21