Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21711 - 21720 of 41672 for jury duty/1000.
Search results 21711 - 21720 of 41672 for jury duty/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
because no jury had been called and therefore jeopardy had not attached. We agree that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76315 - 2012-01-10
because no jury had been called and therefore jeopardy had not attached. We agree that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76315 - 2012-01-10
State v. Perry R. Neal
that (1) Neal did not waive his right to a jury trial and (2) the sentences imposed on five of the counts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7504 - 2005-03-31
that (1) Neal did not waive his right to a jury trial and (2) the sentences imposed on five of the counts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7504 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Carl Andre Brown
-3048-CR 6 unreliable for one reason or another. It is the function of the jury to decide issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7043 - 2017-09-20
-3048-CR 6 unreliable for one reason or another. It is the function of the jury to decide issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7043 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Hernandez’s testimony as a part of its case against Miller. The jury found Miller guilty and the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913352 - 2025-02-11
Hernandez’s testimony as a part of its case against Miller. The jury found Miller guilty and the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913352 - 2025-02-11
State v. James J. Peckham
appeals from a judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of one count of first-degree sexual assault
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5318 - 2005-03-31
appeals from a judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of one count of first-degree sexual assault
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5318 - 2005-03-31
State v. Carl Andre Brown
unreliable for one reason or another. It is the function of the jury to decide issues of credibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7043 - 2005-03-31
unreliable for one reason or another. It is the function of the jury to decide issues of credibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7043 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joseph H. Gray
was for the trier of fact, and we must adopt all reasonable inferences which support the jury’s verdict. Id. at 504
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21482 - 2006-02-21
was for the trier of fact, and we must adopt all reasonable inferences which support the jury’s verdict. Id. at 504
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21482 - 2006-02-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, following a jury trial, of one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm, as a repeater, and one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212765 - 2018-05-15
, following a jury trial, of one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm, as a repeater, and one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212765 - 2018-05-15
State v. Raymond F. Schordie
accept the one drawn by the trier of fact. See id. A jury verdict will be overturned only if, viewing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11614 - 2005-03-31
accept the one drawn by the trier of fact. See id. A jury verdict will be overturned only if, viewing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11614 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kristoffer A. Ashmore
was outweighed by the danger of an unfair prejudicial effect, namely that the jury would be inclined to convict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14865 - 2005-03-31
was outweighed by the danger of an unfair prejudicial effect, namely that the jury would be inclined to convict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14865 - 2005-03-31