Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21711 - 21720 of 58500 for speedy trial.
Search results 21711 - 21720 of 58500 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
for a new trial.[1] The circuit court denied Dunlap’s motion without an evidentiary hearing, concluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122799 - 2014-09-29
for a new trial.[1] The circuit court denied Dunlap’s motion without an evidentiary hearing, concluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122799 - 2014-09-29
[PDF]
NOTICE
sentence. The trial court denied Powell’s motion without a hearing. We conclude that Powell is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34847 - 2014-09-15
sentence. The trial court denied Powell’s motion without a hearing. We conclude that Powell is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34847 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jason C. Kinstler
Program. No. 97-2899-CR 2 After the trial court denied a defense motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13094 - 2017-09-21
Program. No. 97-2899-CR 2 After the trial court denied a defense motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13094 - 2017-09-21
State v. Richard Austin
not have probable cause to arrest. ¶7 The trial court conducted the refusal hearing on January 12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7269 - 2005-03-31
not have probable cause to arrest. ¶7 The trial court conducted the refusal hearing on January 12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7269 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jason C. Kinstler
abuse. After the trial court denied a defense motion to suppress the results of a search of Kinstler’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13094 - 2005-03-31
abuse. After the trial court denied a defense motion to suppress the results of a search of Kinstler’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13094 - 2005-03-31
State v. Paul Delao Quiroz
the judgment and order of the trial court. FACTS ¶2 In a criminal complaint filed on November 4, 1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4062 - 2005-03-31
the judgment and order of the trial court. FACTS ¶2 In a criminal complaint filed on November 4, 1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4062 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a hearing. Merchant claims that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149111 - 2017-09-21
a hearing. Merchant claims that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149111 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
an order denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 motion for a new trial. 1 The circuit court denied Dunlap’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122799 - 2014-09-30
an order denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 motion for a new trial. 1 The circuit court denied Dunlap’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122799 - 2014-09-30
Williams Corner Investors, LLC v. Areawide Cellular, LLC
the record and hearing the evidence, the trial court found no excusable neglect. The court made several
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6321 - 2005-03-31
the record and hearing the evidence, the trial court found no excusable neglect. The court made several
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6321 - 2005-03-31
Marquette University v. Debbie A. Lapertosa
. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Marquette University (Marquette) appeals from the trial court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15513 - 2005-03-31
. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Marquette University (Marquette) appeals from the trial court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15513 - 2005-03-31