Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21721 - 21730 of 59311 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 21721 - 21730 of 59311 for SMALL CLAIMS.
[PDF]
Robert A. Armbruster v. Douglas Fitzgerald
filed a written argument in which they argued the merits of their claim for compensatory and punitive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3987 - 2017-09-20
filed a written argument in which they argued the merits of their claim for compensatory and punitive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3987 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to raise the issues in Bridges’ motion. Specifically, Bridges claimed that there had been insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179029 - 2017-09-21
to raise the issues in Bridges’ motion. Specifically, Bridges claimed that there had been insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179029 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
claim requires a defendant to show two things: (1) that he “is a member of a cognizable group
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260647 - 2020-05-19
claim requires a defendant to show two things: (1) that he “is a member of a cognizable group
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260647 - 2020-05-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
there would be any arguable merit to a claim that Sutrick’s plea was not entered knowingly, intelligently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912792 - 2025-02-11
there would be any arguable merit to a claim that Sutrick’s plea was not entered knowingly, intelligently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912792 - 2025-02-11
Kenneth Onapolis v. State
claims the trial court erred in not recognizing that the Rule of Specialty incorporated in the United
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24886 - 2006-05-30
claims the trial court erred in not recognizing that the Rule of Specialty incorporated in the United
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24886 - 2006-05-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
claims. With regard to the failure to call Crystal and Marsh, the court found that Jackson had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=438626 - 2021-10-12
claims. With regard to the failure to call Crystal and Marsh, the court found that Jackson had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=438626 - 2021-10-12
[PDF]
State v. Linda D.
to her four children, Chrishambie, Chifawndie, Chontanite, and Cory. She claims: (1) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13896 - 2014-09-15
to her four children, Chrishambie, Chifawndie, Chontanite, and Cory. She claims: (1) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13896 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
incriminating statements, claiming he had invoked his right to an attorney and claiming that his statements
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117632 - 2017-09-21
incriminating statements, claiming he had invoked his right to an attorney and claiming that his statements
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117632 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
at the sentencing hearing following his probation revocation. Birkholz’s motion included a claim that counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241830 - 2019-06-11
at the sentencing hearing following his probation revocation. Birkholz’s motion included a claim that counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241830 - 2019-06-11
Brown County Department of Human Services v. Neung S.
children[2] and an order denying post-verdict relief. She claims that her trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2203 - 2005-03-31
children[2] and an order denying post-verdict relief. She claims that her trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2203 - 2005-03-31