Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21721 - 21730 of 83395 for case search.
Search results 21721 - 21730 of 83395 for case search.
Mid-Plains, Inc. v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
, and remanded the case to the Commission to hear and re-determine those issues. Additionally—and apparently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13787 - 2005-03-31
, and remanded the case to the Commission to hear and re-determine those issues. Additionally—and apparently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13787 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
order denying his motion to compel postconviction counsel to turn over his “attorney-client” case file
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101932 - 2013-09-23
order denying his motion to compel postconviction counsel to turn over his “attorney-client” case file
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101932 - 2013-09-23
[PDF]
State v. Robert W. Thurston
in the civil case. He asserted that the State was precluded from bringing criminal charges against him.2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12426 - 2017-09-21
in the civil case. He asserted that the State was precluded from bringing criminal charges against him.2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12426 - 2017-09-21
City of Janesville v. CC Midwest, Inc.
business” is at the heart of this case. In the view of the City of Janesville, a “comparable replacement
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17802 - 2005-04-20
business” is at the heart of this case. In the view of the City of Janesville, a “comparable replacement
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17802 - 2005-04-20
State v. Thomas F.w.
argues that the appeal is moot because the order appealed from expired on January 4, 1996. A case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9582 - 2005-03-31
argues that the appeal is moot because the order appealed from expired on January 4, 1996. A case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9582 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
did not adequately explain its decision; (2) the number of hours the attorneys worked on the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112784 - 2017-09-21
did not adequately explain its decision; (2) the number of hours the attorneys worked on the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112784 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
from four Iron County Circuit Court cases—three counts of disorderly conduct, two counts of second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43887 - 2009-11-23
from four Iron County Circuit Court cases—three counts of disorderly conduct, two counts of second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43887 - 2009-11-23
[PDF]
State v. William McCall
connections. She answered “possibly,” to the question whether she could judge a drug case fairly. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2167 - 2017-09-19
connections. She answered “possibly,” to the question whether she could judge a drug case fairly. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2167 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
explain its decision; (2) the number of hours the attorneys worked on the case was unreasonable; (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112784 - 2014-05-27
explain its decision; (2) the number of hours the attorneys worked on the case was unreasonable; (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112784 - 2014-05-27
State v. Andrew D. Birmingham
. Birmingham submit to a PBT.” The court reasoned the “PBT did exactly what it was supposed to do in cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18733 - 2005-06-28
. Birmingham submit to a PBT.” The court reasoned the “PBT did exactly what it was supposed to do in cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18733 - 2005-06-28