Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21721 - 21730 of 29823 for des.

[PDF] State v. Donald J. McGuire
are questions of law that we review de novo. Id. at 137-38. No. 04-1618-CR 6 The initial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7563 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
this court reviews de novo. State v. Willett, 2000 WI App 212, ¶4, 238 Wis. 2d 621, 618 N.W.2d 881. ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34444 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
” is not supported by the evidence. ¶11 Our review of a jury verdict is not, of course, de novo. Rather, even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87624 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Paulan G. Stefanovic
. v. Briggs, 204 Wis.2d 401, 407, 555 N.W.2d 651, 654 (Ct. App. 1996). However, despite our de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12651 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Corey Miller
, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo.… However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12493 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
for Waukesha County: Linda M. van de water, Judge. Reversed. ¶1 NEUBAUER, P.J.[1] Jon Paul
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72163 - 2011-10-11

COURT OF APPEALS
Wis. 2d 568, ¶26. We determine de novo whether the defendant has demonstrated deficiency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98794 - 2013-07-01

Brenda Murphy v. Bruce C. Nordhagen
6, 1993. We review summary judgments de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13673 - 2005-03-31

Jane Fulton v. Raymond R. Vogt
. Hunzinger Constr. Co., 179 Wis.2d 281, 289, 507 N.W.2d 136, 139 (Ct. App. 1993). Our review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11090 - 2005-03-31

Rock County Department of Human Services v. Phyliss K. T.
de novo. Id. ¶14 Phyliss first argues that she was unable to dispute Dr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4033 - 2005-03-31