Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21721 - 21730 of 29828 for des.
Search results 21721 - 21730 of 29828 for des.
Monica M. Blazekovic v. City of Milwaukee
summary judgment motions de novo. See Sawyer v. Midelfort, 217 Wis.2d 795, 804, 579 N.W.2d 268, 271 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14199 - 2005-03-31
summary judgment motions de novo. See Sawyer v. Midelfort, 217 Wis.2d 795, 804, 579 N.W.2d 268, 271 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14199 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert K.
of law subject to our de novo review. State v. April O., 2000 WI App 70, ¶6, 233 Wis. 2d 663, 607 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7669 - 2005-03-31
of law subject to our de novo review. State v. April O., 2000 WI App 70, ¶6, 233 Wis. 2d 663, 607 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7669 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
The Falk Corporation v. Basil E. Ryan, Jr.
involves an interpretation of the prior order, however, we review the trial court’s interpretation de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10837 - 2017-09-20
involves an interpretation of the prior order, however, we review the trial court’s interpretation de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10837 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
are questions of law that we review de novo. See id. No. 2013AP2679-CR 8 B. Application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120946 - 2014-09-15
are questions of law that we review de novo. See id. No. 2013AP2679-CR 8 B. Application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120946 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Cedric Johnson
that this court reviews de novo. Id., 150 Wis.2d at 97, 441 N.W.2d at 279. If a new factor exists, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10885 - 2017-09-20
that this court reviews de novo. Id., 150 Wis.2d at 97, 441 N.W.2d at 279. If a new factor exists, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10885 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Walter W. Blanck Sr.
or her due process rights raises constitutional issues that we review de novo. State v. Leighton, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3562 - 2017-09-19
or her due process rights raises constitutional issues that we review de novo. State v. Leighton, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3562 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo. Id., ¶19. However, we will uphold the circuit court’s factual findings unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80829 - 2014-09-15
that we review de novo. Id., ¶19. However, we will uphold the circuit court’s factual findings unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80829 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the statutory standard for recommitment, however, is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=301821 - 2020-11-04
the statutory standard for recommitment, however, is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=301821 - 2020-11-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a de novo standard of review.... We construe divorce judgments at the time of their entry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102716 - 2017-09-21
a de novo standard of review.... We construe divorce judgments at the time of their entry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102716 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of summary judgment de novo, “applying the same methodology as the circuit court but benefiting from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789716 - 2024-04-16
of summary judgment de novo, “applying the same methodology as the circuit court but benefiting from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789716 - 2024-04-16