Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21721 - 21730 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Search results 21721 - 21730 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Williams Corner Investors, LLC v. Areawide Cellular, LLC
the record and hearing the evidence, the trial court found no excusable neglect. The court made several
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6321 - 2005-03-31
the record and hearing the evidence, the trial court found no excusable neglect. The court made several
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6321 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Paul N. Westley appeals a judgment of conviction, following a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=279472 - 2020-08-18
2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Paul N. Westley appeals a judgment of conviction, following a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=279472 - 2020-08-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
argued trial counsel was ineffective for failing to obtain, before sentencing, a sentencing memorandum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=963506 - 2025-06-04
argued trial counsel was ineffective for failing to obtain, before sentencing, a sentencing memorandum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=963506 - 2025-06-04
The Estate of Martha Burgess v. Carl Peterson
appeal. Upon affirmance, the trial court ordered Edna to pay the surety companies $88,656.84
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10853 - 2005-03-31
appeal. Upon affirmance, the trial court ordered Edna to pay the surety companies $88,656.84
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10853 - 2005-03-31
State v. Carlos L. Vasquez
. Vasquez's primary contention is that the trial court erred in not permitting him to withdraw his Alford plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9970 - 2005-03-31
. Vasquez's primary contention is that the trial court erred in not permitting him to withdraw his Alford plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9970 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
ineffective assistance of counsel and is entitled to a new trial in the interest of justice. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80692 - 2014-09-15
ineffective assistance of counsel and is entitled to a new trial in the interest of justice. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80692 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Dorene A. Goswitz v. Harlan R. Heinz
psychologist, appeared as an expert witness at the custody trial and testified on Johnson’s behalf. Goswitz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14777 - 2017-09-21
psychologist, appeared as an expert witness at the custody trial and testified on Johnson’s behalf. Goswitz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14777 - 2017-09-21
Marquette University v. Debbie A. Lapertosa
. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Marquette University (Marquette) appeals from the trial court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15513 - 2005-03-31
. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Marquette University (Marquette) appeals from the trial court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15513 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
for a new trial.[1] The circuit court denied Dunlap’s motion without an evidentiary hearing, concluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122799 - 2014-09-29
for a new trial.[1] The circuit court denied Dunlap’s motion without an evidentiary hearing, concluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122799 - 2014-09-29
COURT OF APPEALS
Griffin’s. ¶5 After hearing the testimony, the trial court rejected Griffin’s claims of abuse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34437 - 2008-10-29
Griffin’s. ¶5 After hearing the testimony, the trial court rejected Griffin’s claims of abuse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34437 - 2008-10-29