Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21731 - 21740 of 84312 for case number.
Search results 21731 - 21740 of 84312 for case number.
[PDF]
CTI of Northeast Wisconsin, LLC v. Larry Herrell
2003 WI App 19 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-1881
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5469 - 2017-09-19
2003 WI App 19 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-1881
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5469 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
than this case. That Krupp was convicted of a third offense of operating while under
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220386 - 2018-10-02
than this case. That Krupp was convicted of a third offense of operating while under
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220386 - 2018-10-02
COURT OF APPEALS
in a zoning case. We affirm. ¶2 The Town of LaPrairie commenced this action against Mule Hill
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30392 - 2007-09-26
in a zoning case. We affirm. ¶2 The Town of LaPrairie commenced this action against Mule Hill
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30392 - 2007-09-26
COURT OF APPEALS
that Morgese is not entitled to a resentencing, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Morgese pled guilty in case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30483 - 2007-10-09
that Morgese is not entitled to a resentencing, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Morgese pled guilty in case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30483 - 2007-10-09
[PDF]
WI APP 92
be distributed to Mary Jo. The petition was filed with the probate court under the case number of the pending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32735 - 2014-09-15
be distributed to Mary Jo. The petition was filed with the probate court under the case number of the pending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32735 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
version. No. 2023AP2271-CR 3 which plague[d] a large number of these motions” and credited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983226 - 2025-07-16
version. No. 2023AP2271-CR 3 which plague[d] a large number of these motions” and credited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983226 - 2025-07-16
[PDF]
County of Walworth v. Patrick Wolf
. 1 (1968). 5 We make a number of observations about the state of the record in this case. First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5311 - 2017-09-19
. 1 (1968). 5 We make a number of observations about the state of the record in this case. First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5311 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Anthony A. Parker
2001 WI App 111 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 00
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2672 - 2017-09-19
2001 WI App 111 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 00
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2672 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Douglas Wolff
, it argues that neither defense counsel nor the prosecutor elicited evidence of the result. In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10701 - 2017-09-20
, it argues that neither defense counsel nor the prosecutor elicited evidence of the result. In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10701 - 2017-09-20
State v. Douglas Wolff
defense counsel nor the prosecutor elicited evidence of the result. In this case, defense counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10701 - 2005-03-31
defense counsel nor the prosecutor elicited evidence of the result. In this case, defense counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10701 - 2005-03-31