Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21751 - 21760 of 29823 for des.
Search results 21751 - 21760 of 29823 for des.
2007 WI APP 240
whether the Waalen language clarifies the statutory term “materially impaired.” We employ a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30631 - 2007-11-27
whether the Waalen language clarifies the statutory term “materially impaired.” We employ a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30631 - 2007-11-27
Louis Zink, Jr. v. Akhatar Khwaja
of statutory interpretation which we decide de novo. See Timm v. Portage County Drainage Dist., 145 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15014 - 2005-03-31
of statutory interpretation which we decide de novo. See Timm v. Portage County Drainage Dist., 145 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15014 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Jane Hemberger v. Jo Ann Bitzer
construction which this court reviews de novo. See Hughes v. Chrysler Motors Corp., 197 Wis. 2d 973, 978
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17172 - 2017-09-21
construction which this court reviews de novo. See Hughes v. Chrysler Motors Corp., 197 Wis. 2d 973, 978
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17172 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI App 68
to an undisputed set of facts, which also presents a question of law we review de novo.” Id. ¶7 The primary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=432034 - 2021-11-16
to an undisputed set of facts, which also presents a question of law we review de novo.” Id. ¶7 The primary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=432034 - 2021-11-16
Associated/F&M Bank v. Ray A. Johnson
for summary judgment. We review a motion for summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3864 - 2005-03-31
for summary judgment. We review a motion for summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3864 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
are presented with a question of law for our de novo review. See Green County Dep’t of Human Servs. v. H.N
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43493 - 2009-11-10
are presented with a question of law for our de novo review. See Green County Dep’t of Human Servs. v. H.N
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43493 - 2009-11-10
COURT OF APPEALS
by the evidence is, however, an issue of law that we review de novo. See State v. Turnpaugh, 2007 WI App 222, ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60799 - 2011-03-07
by the evidence is, however, an issue of law that we review de novo. See State v. Turnpaugh, 2007 WI App 222, ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60799 - 2011-03-07
COURT OF APPEALS
). Whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60436 - 2011-03-01
). Whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60436 - 2011-03-01
[PDF]
Jessica L. Edwardson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
injuries. We review summary judgments de novo, employing the same methodology as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14104 - 2014-09-15
injuries. We review summary judgments de novo, employing the same methodology as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14104 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. This court reviews de novo the legal questions of whether deficient performance has been established
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77359 - 2014-09-15
. This court reviews de novo the legal questions of whether deficient performance has been established
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77359 - 2014-09-15