Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21751 - 21760 of 46086 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 21751 - 21760 of 46086 for paternity test paper work.
[PDF]
State v. William James, Jr.
are adjudicated, articulates a two-pronged test in reviewing the reasonableness of an attorney's performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8472 - 2017-09-19
are adjudicated, articulates a two-pronged test in reviewing the reasonableness of an attorney's performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8472 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Milwaukee County v. Sylvia's Eagle Express, Inc.
’ that the action taken was appropriate?” This test applies to the stopping of a vehicle and detention of its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4871 - 2017-09-19
’ that the action taken was appropriate?” This test applies to the stopping of a vehicle and detention of its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4871 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). The evidentiary test on certiorari review is the substantial evidence test, under which we determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131864 - 2017-09-21
). The evidentiary test on certiorari review is the substantial evidence test, under which we determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131864 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth Moffett
are multiplicitous is a question of law that we review de novo based on a two-fold test. First, we examine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15969 - 2017-09-21
are multiplicitous is a question of law that we review de novo based on a two-fold test. First, we examine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15969 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
been committed. So, we would apply the reasonable suspicion test here. No. 2010AP1883 5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58717 - 2014-09-15
been committed. So, we would apply the reasonable suspicion test here. No. 2010AP1883 5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58717 - 2014-09-15
State v. Courtney J.R.
evidence met the two-pronged test for admission, we affirm. Additionally, because the defendant failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12514 - 2005-03-31
evidence met the two-pronged test for admission, we affirm. Additionally, because the defendant failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12514 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
obtained during the stop, along with the results of the chemical test for blood alcohol content, on grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36788 - 2009-06-16
obtained during the stop, along with the results of the chemical test for blood alcohol content, on grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36788 - 2009-06-16
State v. A. David McCormack
of the test, this court need not examine the other prong. Id. at 697. Counsel's strategic choices
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8192 - 2005-03-31
of the test, this court need not examine the other prong. Id. at 697. Counsel's strategic choices
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8192 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael S. Czarnecki
, slurred speech and was “thick tongued.” Czarnecki failed the field sobriety tests and he was arrested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16247 - 2005-03-31
, slurred speech and was “thick tongued.” Czarnecki failed the field sobriety tests and he was arrested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16247 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
), there is no difference between the test for the sufficiency of circumstantial evidence or direct evidence and maintains
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980062 - 2025-07-09
), there is no difference between the test for the sufficiency of circumstantial evidence or direct evidence and maintains
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980062 - 2025-07-09