Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21751 - 21760 of 61139 for quit claim deed/1000.

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 05, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
for post-conviction relief under Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2003-04).[1] Edwards claims the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27303 - 2006-12-04

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of his restitution claim. D.H. testified that he had a leather jacket, his barber kit, and some cash
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=718650 - 2023-10-24

[PDF] CA Blank Order
). The record belies this claim. The circuit court’s plea colloquy, as supplemented by a plea questionnaire
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197583 - 2017-10-11

CA Blank Order
could be placed in the program.[2] His claim is based on negotiations his attorney engaged in with his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95390 - 2013-04-16

[PDF] NOTICE
also moved for summary judgment dismissing Bushard’s claim that Reisman was not entitled to take
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51059 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Dale Vercauteren v. County of Oconto
. ¶5 The Vercauterens filed a notice of claim for damages in Oconto County. Upon rejection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2905 - 2017-09-19

Ann M. Zutz v. Gregory S. Zutz
involved a legal conclusion regarding Gregory's claim that under § 767.32(1)(b)2 and (2), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10714 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Donald Kaltenbach
, claiming that counsel was ineffective. In the alternative, he requested resentencing. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3020 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
or, alternatively, resentencing, based on claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. He argued that he received
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213185 - 2018-05-23

COURT OF APPEALS
moved for summary judgment dismissing Bushard’s claim that Reisman was not entitled to take a salary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51059 - 2010-06-14