Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21751 - 21760 of 63951 for records/1000.
Search results 21751 - 21760 of 63951 for records/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
. The State may use any evidence showing that the plea was valid and may rely on any portion of the Record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40469 - 2009-09-08
. The State may use any evidence showing that the plea was valid and may rely on any portion of the Record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40469 - 2009-09-08
COURT OF APPEALS
. The record in this case does not demonstrate that the caller was vulnerable to criminal liability had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29994 - 2007-08-15
. The record in this case does not demonstrate that the caller was vulnerable to criminal liability had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29994 - 2007-08-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the report and the response and an independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=348653 - 2021-03-25
of the report and the response and an independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=348653 - 2021-03-25
State v. James W. Whistleman
pictorial reproduction or audio recording of a child engaged in sexually explicit conduct under all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3192 - 2005-03-31
pictorial reproduction or audio recording of a child engaged in sexually explicit conduct under all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3192 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence at issue. When reviewing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104259 - 2013-11-18
to show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence at issue. When reviewing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104259 - 2013-11-18
State v. Tecia D.B.
. 1995). This court will not reverse a court’s discretionary decision unless the record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6838 - 2005-03-31
. 1995). This court will not reverse a court’s discretionary decision unless the record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6838 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders, 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=853242 - 2024-09-24
independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders, 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=853242 - 2024-09-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for No. 2023AP1318-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=804505 - 2024-05-22
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for No. 2023AP1318-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=804505 - 2024-05-22
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth L. Moucha
discretionary decision will be affirmed unless its ruling is not based on facts in the record, or is not based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13322 - 2017-09-21
discretionary decision will be affirmed unless its ruling is not based on facts in the record, or is not based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13322 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and has independently reviewed the record. This court agrees with counsel’s conclusion that an appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234872 - 2019-02-12
and has independently reviewed the record. This court agrees with counsel’s conclusion that an appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234872 - 2019-02-12