Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21761 - 21770 of 59253 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 21761 - 21770 of 59253 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Faith Tasker v. Chieftain Wildrice Company
a summary judgment dismissing her claims against Chieftain Wildrice Company. Tasker argues that Chieftain’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5458 - 2005-03-31
a summary judgment dismissing her claims against Chieftain Wildrice Company. Tasker argues that Chieftain’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5458 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 27, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
to withdraw his plea. Lewer claims that: (1) he did not consent to the pat-down search, and (2) his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27555 - 2006-12-26
to withdraw his plea. Lewer claims that: (1) he did not consent to the pat-down search, and (2) his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27555 - 2006-12-26
COURT OF APPEALS
to testify at a postconviction hearing, Brueser would claim that when the police encountered her after she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138312 - 2015-03-31
to testify at a postconviction hearing, Brueser would claim that when the police encountered her after she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138312 - 2015-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Among other evidence relevant to his self-defense claim, the trial testimony established that, a few
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=711920 - 2023-10-11
. Among other evidence relevant to his self-defense claim, the trial testimony established that, a few
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=711920 - 2023-10-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Id. ¶10 Locke’s first claim for sentence modification is based on a new factor—namely, that one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=279864 - 2020-08-18
. Id. ¶10 Locke’s first claim for sentence modification is based on a new factor—namely, that one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=279864 - 2020-08-18
Robert Wagoner v. City of Milwaukee
of Milwaukee.[1] The Estate sued the City, claiming that the City was negligent for failing to cut weeds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3690 - 2005-03-31
of Milwaukee.[1] The Estate sued the City, claiming that the City was negligent for failing to cut weeds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3690 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
report first addresses Moran’s guilty pleas and concludes that any claim challenging the pleas would
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100950 - 2013-08-20
report first addresses Moran’s guilty pleas and concludes that any claim challenging the pleas would
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100950 - 2013-08-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Accordingly, the record does not bear out such a claim, and there is no arguable merit to a challenge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108098 - 2017-09-21
. Accordingly, the record does not bear out such a claim, and there is no arguable merit to a challenge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108098 - 2017-09-21
Ronald W. Morters v. Joseph R. Kuenzli and Shila A. Kuenzili
. The personal injury claims were subsequently settled through arbitration. After arbitration, Attorney Zick
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13686 - 2005-03-31
. The personal injury claims were subsequently settled through arbitration. After arbitration, Attorney Zick
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13686 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Calvin R. Clemons
to § 948.02(2), STATS. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Clemons claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12299 - 2017-09-21
to § 948.02(2), STATS. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Clemons claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12299 - 2017-09-21