Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21761 - 21770 of 29823 for des.
Search results 21761 - 21770 of 29823 for des.
Frontsheet
N.W.2d 125. We review the referee's conclusions of law, however, on a de novo basis. Id. Finally
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84159 - 2012-06-26
N.W.2d 125. We review the referee's conclusions of law, however, on a de novo basis. Id. Finally
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84159 - 2012-06-26
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 21, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
to seek declaratory relief is a question of law we decide de novo. See Village of Slinger v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27536 - 2006-12-20
to seek declaratory relief is a question of law we decide de novo. See Village of Slinger v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27536 - 2006-12-20
State v. Shawn R. Lee
. The construction of a statute, or its application to undisputed facts, is a question of law which we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13055 - 2005-03-31
. The construction of a statute, or its application to undisputed facts, is a question of law which we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13055 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dion C. Mitchell
review de novo.” Id., 201 Wis. 2d at 310, 548 N.W.2d at 53. If, however: “the defendant fails to allege
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6225 - 2005-03-31
review de novo.” Id., 201 Wis. 2d at 310, 548 N.W.2d at 53. If, however: “the defendant fails to allege
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6225 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jason M. Collins
review de novo. See State v. Lohmeier, 205 Wis.2d 183, 191-92, 556 N.W.2d 90, 93 (1996). In our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13658 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. See State v. Lohmeier, 205 Wis.2d 183, 191-92, 556 N.W.2d 90, 93 (1996). In our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13658 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). We review de novo whether the circuit court erred when it denied Churchill’s motion for a Franks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=946302 - 2025-04-23
). We review de novo whether the circuit court erred when it denied Churchill’s motion for a Franks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=946302 - 2025-04-23
State v. Duran Thomas
the trial court properly exercised its discretion is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2460 - 2005-03-31
the trial court properly exercised its discretion is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2460 - 2005-03-31
Albert Carini v. The Medical Protective Company
attempted to “de-personalize” the instruction,[7] the potential prejudice was reduced by the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2665 - 2005-03-31
attempted to “de-personalize” the instruction,[7] the potential prejudice was reduced by the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2665 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ronald D. Hull
the constitutional standard is a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Krier, 165 Wis. 2d 673, 676
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2668 - 2005-03-31
the constitutional standard is a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Krier, 165 Wis. 2d 673, 676
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2668 - 2005-03-31
Jeffrey Opichka v. Racine County
. The deputies appeal. DISCUSSION ¶8 We review summary judgment decisions de novo, using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24711 - 2006-05-30
. The deputies appeal. DISCUSSION ¶8 We review summary judgment decisions de novo, using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24711 - 2006-05-30