Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21761 - 21770 of 29823 for des.

COURT OF APPEALS
construction arise, our review is de novo. See Wisconsin Dep’t of Revenue v. River City Refuse Removal, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66203 - 2011-06-20

[PDF] Jane Hemberger v. Jo Ann Bitzer
construction which this court reviews de novo. See Hughes v. Chrysler Motors Corp., 197 Wis. 2d 973, 978
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17172 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI App 68
to an undisputed set of facts, which also presents a question of law we review de novo.” Id. ¶7 The primary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=432034 - 2021-11-16

Associated/F&M Bank v. Ray A. Johnson
for summary judgment. We review a motion for summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3864 - 2005-03-31

Roberta L. Gorenstein v. Ralph G. Gorenstein
, 178 Wis.2d 137, 153, 502 N.W.2d 918, 925 (Ct. App. 1993). We review conclusions of law de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12300 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
are presented with a question of law for our de novo review. See Green County Dep’t of Human Servs. v. H.N
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43493 - 2009-11-10

State v. La Rae J. Schell
a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5287 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
by the evidence is, however, an issue of law that we review de novo. See State v. Turnpaugh, 2007 WI App 222, ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60799 - 2011-03-07

COURT OF APPEALS
review the trial court’s decision de novo. See Grosse v. Protective Life Ins. Co., 182 Wis. 2d 97, 105
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84841 - 2012-07-17

State v. Elmer J. K.
to engage in contract interpretation. Construction of a contract is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14280 - 2005-03-31