Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21761 - 21770 of 65254 for or b.
Search results 21761 - 21770 of 65254 for or b.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was sentenced as required by WIS. STAT. RULE 809.30(2)(b). The State does not contend on appeal that Mattis’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186774 - 2017-09-21
was sentenced as required by WIS. STAT. RULE 809.30(2)(b). The State does not contend on appeal that Mattis’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186774 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
to a new trial with a twelve-person jury because he failed to raise the issue during his first trial. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15521 - 2005-03-31
to a new trial with a twelve-person jury because he failed to raise the issue during his first trial. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15521 - 2005-03-31
State v. Donald R. Davis
not satisfied the second prong of the Strickland test.[2] B. Request for a New Trial. ¶20 Davis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4455 - 2005-03-31
not satisfied the second prong of the Strickland test.[2] B. Request for a New Trial. ¶20 Davis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4455 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ruven G. Seibert
as a matter of law. See State v. Dyess, 124 Wis. 2d 525, 547, 370 N.W.2d 222 (1985). B. Sufficiency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4699 - 2005-03-31
as a matter of law. See State v. Dyess, 124 Wis. 2d 525, 547, 370 N.W.2d 222 (1985). B. Sufficiency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4699 - 2005-03-31
State v. Wilfredo Melo
to accompany him to the hallway, he had not seized Melo at that point. B. Reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11060 - 2005-03-31
to accompany him to the hallway, he had not seized Melo at that point. B. Reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11060 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
lacked probable cause to believe that a traffic violation had occurred, justifying the traffic stop. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103152 - 2013-10-16
lacked probable cause to believe that a traffic violation had occurred, justifying the traffic stop. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103152 - 2013-10-16
State v. Kurt W. Warrington
with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of .10% or more, contrary to § 346.63(1)(b), Stats., second offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8080 - 2005-03-31
with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of .10% or more, contrary to § 346.63(1)(b), Stats., second offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8080 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
offense, in violation of Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(b). His blood alcohol content at the time of the stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43710 - 2009-11-18
offense, in violation of Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(b). His blood alcohol content at the time of the stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43710 - 2009-11-18
Shawano County v. Sarah H.
: (a) Whether the patient is able to identify the type of recommended medication or treatment; (b) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5204 - 2005-03-31
: (a) Whether the patient is able to identify the type of recommended medication or treatment; (b) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5204 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
: michael b. brennan, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 CURLEY, P.J.[1] Sandra Murray, pro se, appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31043 - 2007-12-03
: michael b. brennan, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 CURLEY, P.J.[1] Sandra Murray, pro se, appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31043 - 2007-12-03