Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21771 - 21780 of 30242 for de.
Search results 21771 - 21780 of 30242 for de.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
findings is reviewed de novo. See id., 2008 WI App 166, ¶9, 314 Wis. 2d at 668, 762 N.W.2d at 388–389
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117632 - 2017-09-21
findings is reviewed de novo. See id., 2008 WI App 166, ¶9, 314 Wis. 2d at 668, 762 N.W.2d at 388–389
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117632 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Ethel M. Payne v. Acuity
court decided this case on summary judgment. Thus, our review is de novo. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18335 - 2017-09-21
court decided this case on summary judgment. Thus, our review is de novo. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18335 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” Id. We review de novo all legal conclusions, including whether the facts alleged state a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125300 - 2017-09-21
.” Id. We review de novo all legal conclusions, including whether the facts alleged state a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125300 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 83
(2) to the record de novo. Halverson v. Tydrich, 156 Wis. 2d 202, 207, 456 N.W.2d 852 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50331 - 2014-09-15
(2) to the record de novo. Halverson v. Tydrich, 156 Wis. 2d 202, 207, 456 N.W.2d 852 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50331 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 138
of the sidewalk. The Gulbrandsens appeal. DISCUSSION ¶5 We review summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39827 - 2014-09-15
of the sidewalk. The Gulbrandsens appeal. DISCUSSION ¶5 We review summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39827 - 2014-09-15
2006 WI APP 235
stop meets constitutional and statutory standards is a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26898 - 2006-11-20
stop meets constitutional and statutory standards is a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26898 - 2006-11-20
State v. Gabriel L. Ortiz
of statutory construction of the restitution statute, Wis. Stat. § 973.20. We review this question de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3391 - 2005-03-31
of statutory construction of the restitution statute, Wis. Stat. § 973.20. We review this question de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3391 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jay D. Harris
. However, whether counsel’s conduct was deficient and prejudicial is a question of law which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16062 - 2005-03-31
. However, whether counsel’s conduct was deficient and prejudicial is a question of law which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16062 - 2005-03-31
State v. Thomas B. Brulport
. Issues of statutory interpretation are questions of law which we review de novo. State v. Mattes, 175
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9228 - 2005-03-31
. Issues of statutory interpretation are questions of law which we review de novo. State v. Mattes, 175
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9228 - 2005-03-31
Stupar River LLC v. Town of Linwood Board of Review
transaction. Because we review the Board’s assessment decision de novo, we need not address whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17803 - 2005-05-02
transaction. Because we review the Board’s assessment decision de novo, we need not address whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17803 - 2005-05-02