Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21771 - 21780 of 29823 for des.
Search results 21771 - 21780 of 29823 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
., ¶40 (citation omitted). Whether a new factor exists is a question of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134577 - 2015-02-09
., ¶40 (citation omitted). Whether a new factor exists is a question of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134577 - 2015-02-09
Ronald C. Kleutgen v. Robert A. McFadyen, Jr.
significance of those facts, however, is a question of law, which we review de novo. Applied here, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20079 - 2005-11-06
significance of those facts, however, is a question of law, which we review de novo. Applied here, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20079 - 2005-11-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
long-time boyfriend and A.M.D.’s de facto stepfather, putting his erect penis into her anus. When
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121276 - 2014-09-15
long-time boyfriend and A.M.D.’s de facto stepfather, putting his erect penis into her anus. When
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121276 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and presents a matter of law, which we review de novo. Wausau Tile, Inc. v. County Concrete Corp., 226 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118312 - 2014-09-15
and presents a matter of law, which we review de novo. Wausau Tile, Inc. v. County Concrete Corp., 226 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118312 - 2014-09-15
Robert P. Murphy v. MCC, Inc.
is a question of law we review de novo. Gunka v. Consolidated Papers, Inc., 179 Wis.2d 525, 531, 508 N.W.2d 426
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13993 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law we review de novo. Gunka v. Consolidated Papers, Inc., 179 Wis.2d 525, 531, 508 N.W.2d 426
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13993 - 2005-03-31
Michael W. Booth v. American States Insurance Company
. The application of a statute to an undisputed set of facts presents an issue of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9088 - 2005-03-31
. The application of a statute to an undisputed set of facts presents an issue of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9088 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
was a reasonable amount. This appeal follows. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶14 We review de novo the grant and denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65083 - 2011-05-31
was a reasonable amount. This appeal follows. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶14 We review de novo the grant and denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65083 - 2011-05-31
COURT OF APPEALS
review a trial court’s own harmless-error conclusion de novo. See State v. Keith, 216 Wis. 2d 61, 69
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31759 - 2008-02-12
review a trial court’s own harmless-error conclusion de novo. See State v. Keith, 216 Wis. 2d 61, 69
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31759 - 2008-02-12
State v. Jay D. Harris
. However, whether counsel’s conduct was deficient and prejudicial is a question of law which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16062 - 2005-03-31
. However, whether counsel’s conduct was deficient and prejudicial is a question of law which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16062 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of constitutional fact we review de novo. State v. Neuaone, 2005 WI App 124, ¶16, 284 Wis. 2d 473
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107272 - 2014-01-28
is a question of constitutional fact we review de novo. State v. Neuaone, 2005 WI App 124, ¶16, 284 Wis. 2d 473
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107272 - 2014-01-28