Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21771 - 21780 of 29712 for des.
Search results 21771 - 21780 of 29712 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court’s factual findings unless clearly erroneous but reviewing de novo whether those facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50188 - 2010-05-24
the circuit court’s factual findings unless clearly erroneous but reviewing de novo whether those facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50188 - 2010-05-24
The Estate of Steven Michael Bydalek v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
. Frank appeals.[5] DISCUSSION We review an order for summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12462 - 2005-03-31
. Frank appeals.[5] DISCUSSION We review an order for summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12462 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 3, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of A...
of law that we review de novo. See id. B. Application of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120946 - 2014-09-02
of law that we review de novo. See id. B. Application of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120946 - 2014-09-02
[PDF]
NOTICE
377. Then, “we review the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo.” State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32281 - 2014-09-15
377. Then, “we review the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo.” State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32281 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
trial and raises a question of law that we review de novo. See id. ¶14 We agree with the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81333 - 2014-09-15
trial and raises a question of law that we review de novo. See id. ¶14 We agree with the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81333 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Frontsheet
. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191126 - 2017-09-21
. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191126 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
the sufficiency of a postconviction motion de novo, based on the four corners of the motion. Id., ¶¶9, 27
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36413 - 2014-09-15
the sufficiency of a postconviction motion de novo, based on the four corners of the motion. Id., ¶¶9, 27
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36413 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
., ¶40 (citation omitted). Whether a new factor exists is a question of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134577 - 2015-02-09
., ¶40 (citation omitted). Whether a new factor exists is a question of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134577 - 2015-02-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
to the facility. The corporation counsel decided not to contest the de facto transfer of Emily to Beaver’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29415 - 2014-09-15
to the facility. The corporation counsel decided not to contest the de facto transfer of Emily to Beaver’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29415 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Gabriel L. Ortiz
statute, WIS. STAT. § 973.20. We review this question de novo without deference to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3391 - 2017-09-19
statute, WIS. STAT. § 973.20. We review this question de novo without deference to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3391 - 2017-09-19