Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21771 - 21780 of 66042 for motion to dismiss.

Margaret J. Schwartz v. Jeffrey D. Schwartz
, brought a motion to enforce the divorce judgment. After taking additional testimony, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8683 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
in the discussion section of this opinion. [3] The court granted the State’s motion to dismiss the operating-while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94931 - 2013-04-03

[PDF] Margaret Jane Kozlowicz v. Jeffrey David Schwartz
with her efforts to obtain financing, brought a motion to enforce the divorce judgment. After taking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10090 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
motion for resentencing.1 Knutson argues that he is entitled to resentencing because: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=603520 - 2022-12-22

[PDF] NOTICE
alcohol concentration, first offense. Lamb argues that the circuit court erred in denying her motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43703 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and an order denying his postconviction motion. 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165666 - 2017-09-21

State v. Shomas T. Winston
postconviction motion. On appeal, Winston argues that: (1) his trial attorney was ineffective; (2) the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25688 - 2006-06-26

[PDF] Alfred A. Zealy v. City of Waukesha
. 3 Zealy has filed a motion with this court asking that we take judicial notice of the minutes
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16878 - 2017-09-21

Alfred A. Zealy v. City of Waukesha
the rezoning because of Zealy's reliance on its representations. The circuit court dismissed Zealy's claims
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16878 - 2005-03-31

WI App 85 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP1195 Complete Title of...
, and granted summary judgment in favor of the building owner, thereby dismissing it from the case. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64424 - 2012-10-02