Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21781 - 21790 of 29823 for des.
Search results 21781 - 21790 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
WI APP 122
presented is one of statutory interpretation, which is a question of law we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=129281 - 2017-09-21
presented is one of statutory interpretation, which is a question of law we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=129281 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Sheri D. Meyers v. Patrick Schultz
methodology as does the circuit court, and our review is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7334 - 2017-09-20
methodology as does the circuit court, and our review is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7334 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
of the defendant is an issue of law, which we review de novo. State v. Lo, 228 Wis. 2d 531, 534, 599 N.W.2d 659
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29105 - 2007-05-21
of the defendant is an issue of law, which we review de novo. State v. Lo, 228 Wis. 2d 531, 534, 599 N.W.2d 659
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29105 - 2007-05-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo. Coffee, 389 Wis. 2d 627, ¶17. ¶10 On appeal, Zwiefelhofer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=422652 - 2021-09-08
is a question of law that we review de novo. Coffee, 389 Wis. 2d 627, ¶17. ¶10 On appeal, Zwiefelhofer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=422652 - 2021-09-08
[PDF]
State v. Eugene W.
is a question of statutory interpretation which we review de novo. Green County Dep’t of Human Servs. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4330 - 2017-09-19
is a question of statutory interpretation which we review de novo. Green County Dep’t of Human Servs. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4330 - 2017-09-19
State v. Sir S. M. L.
of law we review de novo. State v. Jeremy P., 2005 WI App 13, ¶5, 278 Wis. 2d 366, 692 N.W.2d 311. All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19779 - 2005-09-28
of law we review de novo. State v. Jeremy P., 2005 WI App 13, ¶5, 278 Wis. 2d 366, 692 N.W.2d 311. All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19779 - 2005-09-28
[PDF]
The Falk Corporation v. Basil E. Ryan, Jr.
involves an interpretation of the prior order, however, we review the trial court’s interpretation de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10837 - 2017-09-20
involves an interpretation of the prior order, however, we review the trial court’s interpretation de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10837 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment is de novo. Hardy v. Hoefferle, 2007 WI App 264, ¶6, 306 Wis. 2d 513, 743 N.W.2d 843. Summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124906 - 2017-09-21
judgment is de novo. Hardy v. Hoefferle, 2007 WI App 264, ¶6, 306 Wis. 2d 513, 743 N.W.2d 843. Summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124906 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the circuit court’s factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous, but we review de novo whether those
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216043 - 2018-07-24
the circuit court’s factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous, but we review de novo whether those
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216043 - 2018-07-24
[PDF]
State v. Joseph F. Jiles
review de novo. Id., 201 Wis. 2d at 310, 548 N.W.2d at 53. 5 ¶12 First, Jiles alleges that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4841 - 2017-09-19
review de novo. Id., 201 Wis. 2d at 310, 548 N.W.2d at 53. 5 ¶12 First, Jiles alleges that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4841 - 2017-09-19