Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21781 - 21790 of 29712 for des.
Search results 21781 - 21790 of 29712 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 283 Wis. 2d 300, ¶10. We review this question de novo. Id. II. The Circuit Court Properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=649993 - 2023-04-27
, 283 Wis. 2d 300, ¶10. We review this question de novo. Id. II. The Circuit Court Properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=649993 - 2023-04-27
CA Blank Order
are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121, 128, 449 N.W.2d 845 (1990
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147257 - 2015-08-24
are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121, 128, 449 N.W.2d 845 (1990
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147257 - 2015-08-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
performance fell below the constitutional minimum is a question of law we review de novo. Id. at 634. ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=924435 - 2025-03-12
performance fell below the constitutional minimum is a question of law we review de novo. Id. at 634. ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=924435 - 2025-03-12
2007 WI APP 13
to an undisputed set of facts presents us with a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Rydeski, 214
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27329 - 2007-01-30
to an undisputed set of facts presents us with a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Rydeski, 214
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27329 - 2007-01-30
State v. Eddie McAttee
evidence, we determine de novo whether the facts, here undisputed, satisfy the constitutional standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3149 - 2005-03-31
evidence, we determine de novo whether the facts, here undisputed, satisfy the constitutional standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3149 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeremy R. Engebretson
. Finally, we construe a deferred prosecution agreement de novo. See State v. Toliver, 187 Wis. 2d 346, 355
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4688 - 2005-03-31
. Finally, we construe a deferred prosecution agreement de novo. See State v. Toliver, 187 Wis. 2d 346, 355
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4688 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
Admission of Rusch, 171 Wis. 2d 523, 528-29, 492 N.W.2d 153 (1992). We review legal conclusions de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112193 - 2014-05-08
Admission of Rusch, 171 Wis. 2d 523, 528-29, 492 N.W.2d 153 (1992). We review legal conclusions de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112193 - 2014-05-08
COURT OF APPEALS
was a reasonable amount. This appeal follows. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶14 We review de novo the grant and denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65083 - 2011-05-31
was a reasonable amount. This appeal follows. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶14 We review de novo the grant and denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65083 - 2011-05-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
and substantial breach of the plea agreement is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57475 - 2014-09-15
and substantial breach of the plea agreement is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57475 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
performed deficiently and prejudiced the defendant are questions of law which we review de novo. Id. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98322 - 2014-09-15
performed deficiently and prejudiced the defendant are questions of law which we review de novo. Id. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98322 - 2014-09-15