Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21781 - 21790 of 66464 for motion to dismiss.
Search results 21781 - 21790 of 66464 for motion to dismiss.
[PDF]
State v. Debra L. Van Riper
-CR 2 postconviction motion. 1 The circuit court determined that a penalty enhancer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13283 - 2017-09-21
-CR 2 postconviction motion. 1 The circuit court determined that a penalty enhancer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13283 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
County of Walworth v. William H. Guth
than a legal argument, we need not address it. Furthermore, dismissal would likely have been without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25344 - 2017-09-21
than a legal argument, we need not address it. Furthermore, dismissal would likely have been without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25344 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
affirmed the DHA’s revocation decision. Harper appealed that decision and this court dismissed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=688887 - 2023-08-15
affirmed the DHA’s revocation decision. Harper appealed that decision and this court dismissed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=688887 - 2023-08-15
Frontsheet
hearing, and failed to attend a motion hearing seeking enforcement of the judgment, in violation of SCR 20
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46713 - 2010-02-03
hearing, and failed to attend a motion hearing seeking enforcement of the judgment, in violation of SCR 20
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46713 - 2010-02-03
[PDF]
State v. Dean F. Bertrand
a motion to dismiss, claiming that the complaint failed to state a criminal offense. Bertrand maintained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12605 - 2017-09-21
a motion to dismiss, claiming that the complaint failed to state a criminal offense. Bertrand maintained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12605 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
hearing, the trial court considered the parties’ motions in limine and agreed that the upcoming trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114277 - 2017-09-21
hearing, the trial court considered the parties’ motions in limine and agreed that the upcoming trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114277 - 2017-09-21
State v. Eugene G.
for this request was because Eugene G. “remain[ed] in need of custodial treatment.” Eugene G. moved to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6692 - 2005-03-31
for this request was because Eugene G. “remain[ed] in need of custodial treatment.” Eugene G. moved to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6692 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
, and the other count was dismissed and read in for sentencing purposes. Additionally, the State agreed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104665 - 2005-03-31
, and the other count was dismissed and read in for sentencing purposes. Additionally, the State agreed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104665 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
. Stat. Rule 809.32(1)(f) affidavit, counsel demonstrates that a motion to withdraw Rodriguez’s guilty
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105581 - 2013-12-17
. Stat. Rule 809.32(1)(f) affidavit, counsel demonstrates that a motion to withdraw Rodriguez’s guilty
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105581 - 2013-12-17
County of Walworth v. William H. Guth
objection or motion to strike appears of record.”). ¶11 We recognize that Guth participated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25344 - 2006-05-30
objection or motion to strike appears of record.”). ¶11 We recognize that Guth participated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25344 - 2006-05-30