Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21781 - 21790 of 63935 for records/1000.
Search results 21781 - 21790 of 63935 for records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
consideration of the no- merit report and response and an independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134595 - 2017-09-21
consideration of the no- merit report and response and an independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134595 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
conclude that B.M. should not be permitted to withdraw her plea because the totality of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=846577 - 2024-09-10
conclude that B.M. should not be permitted to withdraw her plea because the totality of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=846577 - 2024-09-10
CA Blank Order
independent review of the Record, as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93868 - 2013-03-05
independent review of the Record, as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93868 - 2013-03-05
[PDF]
State v. Tecia D.B.
will not reverse a court’s discretionary decision unless the record shows that it failed to exercise discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6835 - 2017-09-20
will not reverse a court’s discretionary decision unless the record shows that it failed to exercise discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6835 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=522533 - 2022-05-17
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=522533 - 2022-05-17
State v. Henry J. Brookshire
through all of that on the record, right? THE DEFENDANT: Right, and that was after I took
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9258 - 2005-03-31
through all of that on the record, right? THE DEFENDANT: Right, and that was after I took
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9258 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and an independent review of the records as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=290960 - 2020-09-29
. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and an independent review of the records as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=290960 - 2020-09-29
Michael J. Landwehr v. Bernadette N. Landwehr
the correct legal standard to the facts of record and reaches a reasonable result. Id. at 120. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6912 - 2005-03-31
the correct legal standard to the facts of record and reaches a reasonable result. Id. at 120. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6912 - 2005-03-31
Thomas Dale Bottomley v. Linda Lee Bottomley
have been entitled to attorney's fees because Thomas failed to include as part of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10402 - 2005-03-31
have been entitled to attorney's fees because Thomas failed to include as part of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10402 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the no-merit report. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104355 - 2017-09-21
the no-merit report. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104355 - 2017-09-21