Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21781 - 21790 of 63935 for records/1000.
Search results 21781 - 21790 of 63935 for records/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Alan Michael Wiedenhoeft
findings were not clearly erroneous, and because the record reflects that the petition was timely filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15966 - 2017-09-21
findings were not clearly erroneous, and because the record reflects that the petition was timely filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15966 - 2017-09-21
State v. Tecia D.B.
. 1995). This court will not reverse a court’s discretionary decision unless the record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6837 - 2005-03-31
. 1995). This court will not reverse a court’s discretionary decision unless the record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6837 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
be granted a new trial in the interest of justice. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101201 - 2017-09-21
be granted a new trial in the interest of justice. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101201 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Darrin L. Britt
justifying resentencing; (10) that the trial court improperly considered his juvenile record when sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10224 - 2017-09-20
justifying resentencing; (10) that the trial court improperly considered his juvenile record when sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10224 - 2017-09-20
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104324 - 2013-11-19
of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104324 - 2013-11-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
consideration of the no- merit report and response and an independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134595 - 2017-09-21
consideration of the no- merit report and response and an independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134595 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
conclude that B.M. should not be permitted to withdraw her plea because the totality of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=846577 - 2024-09-10
conclude that B.M. should not be permitted to withdraw her plea because the totality of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=846577 - 2024-09-10
CA Blank Order
independent review of the Record, as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93868 - 2013-03-05
independent review of the Record, as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93868 - 2013-03-05
[PDF]
State v. Tecia D.B.
will not reverse a court’s discretionary decision unless the record shows that it failed to exercise discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6835 - 2017-09-20
will not reverse a court’s discretionary decision unless the record shows that it failed to exercise discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6835 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=522533 - 2022-05-17
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=522533 - 2022-05-17