Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21791 - 21800 of 65123 for or b.

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 30, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: Michael b. Brennan, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27928 - 2007-01-29

COURT OF APPEALS
a disturbance is guilty of a Class B misdemeanor.” To prosecute a defendant for disorderly conduct, the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89000 - 2012-11-05

[PDF] NOTICE
division to work a de facto splitting of those gifted assets. Id., ¶1; see also § 767.61(2)(b). ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39276 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
To: Hon. Gregory B. Gill, Jr. Circuit Court Judge 320 S. Walnut St. Appleton, WI 54911 Lonnie Wolf
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103520 - 2017-09-21

James P. Troia v. Carrie A. Troia
a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Dane County: sarah b. o’brien, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13083 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
to a new trial with a twelve-person jury because he failed to raise the issue during his first trial. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15521 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
to a new trial with a twelve-person jury because he failed to raise the issue during his first trial. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15522 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
to a new trial with a twelve-person jury because he failed to raise the issue during his first trial. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15525 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 21, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
Brent Wookey, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kaplan Inc. d/b/a Schweser Study Program
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27528 - 2006-12-20

State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
to a new trial with a twelve-person jury because he failed to raise the issue during his first trial. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15520 - 2005-03-31