Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21791 - 21800 of 82355 for simple case.

[PDF] State v. Steven C.
permission and this court therefore affirms the order. Facts ¶2 The facts of this case are undisputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5050 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
(1) requires an appellant’s brief to contain a statement of the case, “which must include
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42964 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
This case has a long and detailed background, but the relevant facts are as follows. This appeal concerns
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140354 - 2015-04-22

State v. Amy Willoughby
, as well as after the State’s presentation of its case, Willoughby moved to dismiss for failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12407 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
presided over Miller’s motions for sentence credit in this case. Due to judicial rotation, the Honorable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33273 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
was sufficient even if the challenged statements were excised. The case then proceeded to a jury trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207499 - 2018-01-22

State v. Ronnie A. Malloy
the officers that he had a knife on his person. The knife was enclosed in a leather case described by one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17858 - 2005-04-26

[PDF] Dale Phillippi v. Duane Becker
v. Brown County, 90 Wis. 2d 823, 280 N.W.2d 711 (1979). In that case, the supreme court held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16149 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition, and we summarily affirm. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=315579 - 2020-12-22

COURT OF APPEALS
, 693 (“The interpretation and application of case law and statutes to undisputed facts are ordinarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105359 - 2013-12-09